» Articles » PMID: 9667090

Age Differences in Women's Verdicts on the Quality of Primary Health Care Services

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 1998 Jul 17
PMID 9667090
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: One aim of the Patients' Charter initiative is to ensure that general practitioner (GP) services become more sensitive to the expressed needs of patients. Most studies in this area have concentrated on the personal and professional attributes of the GP, and few studies have explored in detail the specific views of women patients.

Aim: To examine age differences in the views of women under the age of 65 years on the quality of different aspects of primary health care services.

Method: A random sample of 1251 women aged 16-65 years was surveyed by postal questionnaire on their use of and satisfaction with primary health care services. Analyses were undertaken of women's verdicts on the best and worst aspects of the services provided.

Results: There is a strong inverse relationship between age and negative evaluations of primary health care services. On each of 20 items ['what are the worst things about the GP surgery?'], older women consistently scored lower than younger women. The results were not so clear-cut among the 20 positive items ('what are the best things about the GP surgery'). On nine items, there was a significant positive association with age (the highest being on 'receptionists are approachable' and 'practice nurse is approachable and easy to talk to'). On nine items, there was no significant age difference, and on the item with the highest overall positive ranking, 'not far to travel to GP surgery', the association was in the opposite direction to that expected, i.e., a larger proportion of women under 40 years of age (72.5%) answered positively than did women over the age of 40 years (64.9%).

Conclusions: It is likely that the relationship between age and positive evaluations of primary health care service is less straightforward than has been assumed previously. Although older women are consistently less willing to criticize primary health care services across the board, they are more discriminating in giving and withholding praise.

Citing Articles

Difficulties faced by patients with chronic diseases in the primary care setting in Singapore: a cross-sectional study.

Koh L, Teo S, Jiang Y, Hwang E, Lee E Singapore Med J. 2020; 62(9):466-471.

PMID: 32299185 PMC: 9251243. DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2020062.


Patient satisfaction and quality of care in walk-in clinics, family practices and emergency departments: the Ontario Walk-In Clinic Study.

Hutchison B, Ostbye T, Barnsley J, Stewart M, Mathews M, Campbell M CMAJ. 2003; 168(8):977-83.

PMID: 12695380 PMC: 152680.


Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients' assessments of primary health care.

Campbell J, Ramsay J, Green J Qual Health Care. 2001; 10(2):90-5.

PMID: 11389317 PMC: 1757978. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.10.2.90.


Profile of attendance at a maternity hospital emergency room.

Morgan J, Cullen W, Bury G, Turner M Ir J Med Sci. 2000; 169(2):122-4.

PMID: 11006668 DOI: 10.1007/BF03166914.

References
1.
Hall J, Dornan M . What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med. 1988; 27(9):935-9. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90284-5. View

2.
Smith C, Armstrong D . Comparison of criteria derived by government and patients for evaluating general practitioner services. BMJ. 1989; 299(6697):494-6. PMC: 1837344. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.299.6697.494. View

3.
Polit D, Sherman R . Statistical power in nursing research. Nurs Res. 1990; 39(6):365-9. View

4.
Baker R . Characteristics of practices, general practitioners and patients related to levels of patients' satisfaction with consultations. Br J Gen Pract. 1996; 46(411):601-5. PMC: 1239785. View

5.
Rubin H, Gandek B, Rogers W, Kosinski M, McHorney C, Ware Jr J . Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1993; 270(7):835-40. View