» Articles » PMID: 9666935

Reliability of an Osteoporosis-Targeted Quality of Life Survey Instrument for Use in the Community: OPTQoL

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 1998 Jul 17
PMID 9666935
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A brief Osteoporosis-Targeted Quality of Life (OPTQoL) questionnaire was previously developed as a cross-sectional survey instrument to assess the community impact of osteoporosis on quality of life in women. The initial development process involving item generation through focus groups, item reduction, and content and construct validation yielded a 36-item questionnaire with three domains (physical difficulty, adaptations and fears) and 10 health-related questions. In the present study, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the questionnaire were assessed in a mail-based study with two clinical sites. Two hundred women (50 with severe osteoporosis, 50 with osteopenia, 50 with normal bone mineral density (BMD) and 50 with osteoarthritis and normal BMD), aged 43-84 years, completed the self-administered questionnaire initially and again about 2 weeks later. Using weighted kappas, agreement between questionnaire administrations ranged from 0.60 to 0.80 for most of the individual items. Intraclass correlation coefficients to assess reliability for the domain scores were 0.93 (physical difficulty), 0.82 (adaptations) and 0.88 (fears). Internal consistency of each of the domains was also high, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.89 to 0.91. Four items were dropped from the 36-item questionnaire due to high percentage of 'not applicable' responses. Results of the analyses support the validity and reliability of this instrument as a cross-sectional survey tool for assessing the impact of osteoporosis on quality of life in women living in the community. The questionnaire has been translated and culturally adapted into seven languages to allow cross-cultural studies of the community impact of osteoporosis.

Citing Articles

Patient reported outcomes for phosphomannomutase 2 congenital disorder of glycosylation (PMM2-CDG): listening to what matters for the patients and health professionals.

Pascoal C, Ferreira I, Teixeira C, Almeida E, Slade A, Brasil S Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022; 17(1):398.

PMID: 36309700 PMC: 9618201. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02551-y.


Dynamic change and influence of osteoporotic back pain with vertebral fracture on related activities and social participation: evaluating reliability and validity of a newly developed outcome measure.

Doi T, Akai M, Endo N, Fujino K, Iwaya T J Bone Miner Metab. 2013; 31(6):663-73.

PMID: 23690160 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-013-0458-5.


Health-related quality of life in patients with osteoporosis in the absence of vertebral fracture: a systematic review.

Wilson S, Sharp C, Davie M Osteoporos Int. 2012; 23(12):2749-68.

PMID: 22814944 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2050-6.


Quality of life in postmenopausal women with reduced bone mineral density: psychometric evaluation of the Polish version of QUALEFFO-41.

Baczyk G, Opala T, Kleka P Arch Med Sci. 2012; 7(3):476-85.

PMID: 22295032 PMC: 3258755. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2011.23415.


Impact of osteoporosis and vertebral fractures on quality-of-life. a population-based study in Valencia, Spain (The FRAVO Study).

Sanfelix-Genoves J, Hurtado I, Sanfelix-Gimeno G, Reig-Molla B, Peiro S Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011; 9:20.

PMID: 21470396 PMC: 3080275. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-20.


References
1.
Melton 3rd L, Chrischilles E, Cooper C, Lane A, Riggs B . Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis?. J Bone Miner Res. 1992; 7(9):1005-10. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070902. View

2.
. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1994; 843:1-129. View

3.
Cook D, Guyatt G, Adachi J, Clifton J, Griffith L, Epstein R . Quality of life issues in women with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1993; 36(6):750-6. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780360603. View

4.
Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D . Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46(12):1417-32. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n. View

5.
McHorney C, Ware Jr J, Rogers W, Raczek A, Lu J . The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1992; 30(5 Suppl):MS253-65. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199205001-00025. View