» Articles » PMID: 9629939

Testing Criteria for Spinal Implants: Recommendations for the Standardization of in Vitro Stability Testing of Spinal Implants

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1998 Jun 18
PMID 9629939
Citations 238
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

New implants and new surgical approaches should be tested in vitro for primary stability in standardized laboratory tests in order to decide the most appropriate approach before being accepted for clinical use. Due to the complex and still unknown loading of the spine in vivo a variety of different test loading conditions have been used, making comparison of the results from different groups almost impossible. This recommendation was developed in a series of workshops with research scientists, orthopedic and trauma surgeons, and research and development executives from spinal implant companies. The purpose was to agree on in vitro testing conditions that would allow results from various research groups to be compared. This paper describes the recommended loading methods, specimen conditions, and analysis parameters resulting from these workshops.

Citing Articles

Range of Motion and Neutral Zone of All Human Spinal Motion Segments: A Data Collection of 30 Years of In Vitro Experiments Performed Under Standardized Testing Conditions.

Wilke H, Kienle A, Werner K, Liebsch C JOR Spine. 2025; 8(1):e70052.

PMID: 40046266 PMC: 11881816. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.70052.


Comparative biomechanical analysis of monocortical and bicortical polyaxial screw rod fixation in canine lumbar vertebral stabilization.

Guevar J, Voumard B, Bergman R, Precht C, Forterre F Front Vet Sci. 2025; 11:1434251.

PMID: 40012615 PMC: 11862917. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1434251.


The importance of the posterior osteoligamentous complex of the lumbar spine: dogma changing biomechanical insights.

Jokeit M, Cornaz F, Schader J, Harshbarger C, Calek A, Jecklin S Eur Spine J. 2025; .

PMID: 39912946 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08690-7.


Development and biomechanical evaluation of a 3D printed analogue of the human lumbar spine.

Dukkipati S, Driscoll M 3D Print Med. 2025; 11(1):3.

PMID: 39843876 PMC: 11755917. DOI: 10.1186/s41205-025-00249-y.


How to improve the mechanical safety of a novel spinal implant while saving costs and time.

Kienle A, Wilke H, Schroder C, Pietsch A JOR Spine. 2024; 7(4):e70026.

PMID: 39726899 PMC: 11669745. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.70026.