» Articles » PMID: 9629112

Defining the Physician's Duty to Warn: Consensus Statement of Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform

Overview
Journal CMAJ
Date 1998 Jun 18
PMID 9629112
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform was formed to consider the duty of Ontario physicians in circumstances where a patient threatens to kill or cause serious bodily harm to a third party. The panel was concerned about the implications of any duty to inform on the integrity of the physician-patient relationship, particularly with respect to confidentiality. The panel agreed that regulations safeguarding the confidentiality of patient information ought to be changed only if there is a critical reason for doing so, but, after deliberation, the panel members concluded that the need to protect the public from serious risk of harm is a paramount concern that should supersede the duty of confidentiality. The recommendations reported here were endorsed in principle by the panelists and the groups they represented (the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, the Canadian Medical Protective Association, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, the Ontario College of Family Physicians and the Ontario Medical Association) and are being implemented by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

Citing Articles

Correlation Between Malpractice Litigation and Legislation Reform in Taiwan Over a 30-Year Period.

Hsieh M, Lu L, Lin C, Chen Y Int J Gen Med. 2021; 14:1889-1898.

PMID: 34040421 PMC: 8139722. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S312640.


Ethical Dilemma and Management of Infertility in HIV Seropositive Discordant Couples: A Case Study in Nigeria.

Umeora O, Chukwuneke F Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013; 3(1):99-101.

PMID: 23634339 PMC: 3634234. DOI: 10.4103/2141-9248.109460.


Addressing intimate partner violence with male patients: a review and introduction of pilot guidelines.

Kimberg L J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(12):2071-8.

PMID: 18830771 PMC: 2596504. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0755-1.


Understanding the effect of domestic violence on pregnancy, labour, and delivery.

Lent B, Morris P, Rechner S Can Fam Physician. 2001; 46:505-7, 516-9.

PMID: 10751986 PMC: 2144984.


Reporting intoxicated drivers.

Winkelaar P Can Fam Physician. 2000; 46:68.

PMID: 10660787 PMC: 1987647.


References
1.
Greenberg L . The evolution of Tarasoff: recent developments in the psychiatrist's duties to warn potential victims, protect the public, and predict dangerousness. J Psychiatry Law. 1984; 12(3):315-48. DOI: 10.1177/009318538401200303. View

2.
Ferris L, Sandercock J, Hoffman B, Silverman M, Barkun H, Carlisle J . Risk assessments for acute violence to third parties: a review of the literature. Can J Psychiatry. 1998; 42(10):1051-60. DOI: 10.1177/070674379704201006. View

3.
Beck J . Violent patients and the Tarasoff duty in private psychiatric practice. J Psychiatry Law. 1985; 13(3-4):361-76. DOI: 10.1177/0093185385013003-404. View

4.
Appelbaum P . Tarasoff and the clinician: problems in fulfilling the duty to protect. Am J Psychiatry. 1985; 142(4):425-9. DOI: 10.1176/ajp.142.4.425. View

5.
Shane F . Confidentiality and dangerousness in the doctor-patient relationship. The position of the Canadian Psychiatric Association. Can J Psychiatry. 1985; 30(4):293-301. DOI: 10.1177/070674378503000416. View