» Articles » PMID: 9618668

The Effects of New York State's Ban on Multiple Listing for Cadaveric Kidney Transplantation

Overview
Journal Health Serv Res
Specialty Health Services
Date 1998 Jun 10
PMID 9618668
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To study the effectiveness of a 1990 ban by New York state on entry to more than one waiting list for a cadaver kidney transplant, and the impact of the ban on equity in access to transplantation.

Data Sources: (1) Waiting list files from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, (2) the Health Care Financing Administration's Medicare Program Management and Medical Information System, and (3) U.S. Census Public Use Files.

Study Design: Multivariate hazard models were used to estimate the impact of the ban of the overall odds of multiple listing and on the odds of multiple listing at in-state and out-of-state transplant centers. After estimating the relationship between multiple listing and subsequent transplantation, we used simulation techniques to estimate the effects of a complete multiple listing ban on group waiting time differentials. Independent variables included demographic/socioeconomic characteristics, measures of ESRD severity, general transplantation suitability, measures that affect the likelihood of finding a good donor organ, and measures of the productivity of the transplant/dialysis center.

Principal Findings: The ban was associated with a 66 percent reduction in the rate of multiple listing for New York patients, and multiple listing at in-state transplant centers declined by 87 percent. Simulation results suggested that even a completely effective ban would produce only small, mixed equity effects.

Conclusions: While the ban was effective in reducing the proportion of patients who registered at multiple transplant centers, taken together the results suggest that banning multiple listing is not likely to result in large improvements in equity in access to transplantation.

Citing Articles

Listing at non-local transplant centers is associated with increased access to deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Ross-Driscoll K, Gunasti J, Lynch R, Massie A, Segev D, Snyder J Am J Transplant. 2022; 22(7):1813-1822.

PMID: 35338697 PMC: 9580509. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17044.


Association between Longer Travel Distance for Transplant Care and Access to Kidney Transplantation and Graft Survival in the United States.

Whelan A, Johansen K, Brar S, McCulloch C, Adey D, Roll G J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021; 32(5):1151-1161.

PMID: 33712528 PMC: 8259680. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2020081242.


Multiple listing in lung transplant candidates: A cohort study.

Mooney J, Yang L, Hedlin H, Mohabir P, Dhillon G Am J Transplant. 2018; 19(4):1098-1108.

PMID: 30253057 PMC: 6433482. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15124.


Outcomes of Multiple Listing for Adult Heart Transplantation in the United States: Analysis of OPTN Data From 2000 to 2013.

Givens R, Dardas T, Clerkin K, Restaino S, Schulze P, Mancini D JACC Heart Fail. 2015; 3(12):933-41.

PMID: 26577617 PMC: 4681637. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.07.012.


Multiple listings as a reflection of geographic disparity in liver transplantation.

Vagefi P, Feng S, Dodge J, Markmann J, Roberts J J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 219(3):496-504.

PMID: 25026876 PMC: 4394199. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.048.

References
1.
Held P, Pauly M, Bovbjerg R, Newmann J, Salvatierra Jr O . Access to kidney transplantation. Has the United States eliminated income and racial differences?. Arch Intern Med. 1988; 148(12):2594-600. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.148.12.2594. View

2.
Sanfilippo F, Vaughn W, Peters T, Shield 3rd C, Adams P, Lorber M . Factors affecting the waiting time of cadaveric kidney transplant candidates in the United States. JAMA. 1992; 267(2):247-52. View

3.
Eggers P . Racial differences in access to kidney transplantation. Health Care Financ Rev. 1995; 17(2):89-103. PMC: 4193554. View

4.
Ozminkowski R, Friedman B, Taylor Z . Access to heart and liver transplantation in the late 1980s. Med Care. 1993; 31(11):1027-42. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199311000-00005. View

5.
Leffell M, Steinberg A, Bias W, Machan C, Zachary A . The distribution of HLA antigens and phenotypes among donors and patients in the UNOS registry. Transplantation. 1994; 58(10):1119-30. View