Prognostic Value of Non-sustained Ventricular Tachycardia and the Potential Role of Amiodarone Treatment in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Assessment in an Unselected Non-referral Based Patient Population
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Amiodarone has been reported to reduce the likelihood of sudden death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, data regarding the clinical course in HCM have traditionally come from selected referral populations biased toward assessment of high risk patients.
Aims: To evaluate antiarrhythmic treatment for sudden death in an HCM population not subject to tertiary referral bias, closely resembling the true disease state present in the community.
Methods: Cardiovascular mortality was assessed in relation to the occurrence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) on 24 or 48 hour ambulatory Holter recording, a finding previously regarded as a marker for sudden death, particularly when the arrhythmia was frequent, repetitive or prolonged. 167 consecutive patients were analysed by multiple Holter ECG recordings (mean (SD) 157 (129) hours) and followed for a mean of 10 (5) years. Only patients with multiple repetitive NSVT were treated with amiodarone, and in relatively low. doses (220 (44) mg/day).
Results: Nine HCM related deaths occurred: 8 were the consequence of congestive heart failure, but only 1 was sudden and unexpected. Three groups of patients were segregated based on their NSVT profile: group 1 (n = 39), multiple (> or = 2 runs) and repetitive bursts (on > or = 2 Holters) of NSVT, or prolonged runs of ventricular tachycardia, included 4 deaths due to heart failure; group 2 (n = 38), isolated infrequent bursts of NSVT, included 1 sudden death; group 3 (n = 90), without NSVT, included 4 heart failure deaths. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant differences in survival between the three groups throughout follow up.
Conclusions: In an unselected patient population with HCM, isolated, non-repetitive bursts of NSVT were not associated with adverse prognosis and so this arrhythmia does not appear to justify chronic antiarrhythmic treatment. Amiodarone, administered in relatively low doses, did not carry an independent and additive risk for cardiac mortality. Amiodarone may have contributed to the absence of sudden cardiac death in patients believed to be at higher risk because of multiple repetitive NSVT.
Mexican guidelines 2024 for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Llamas-Esperon G, Berrios-Barcenas E, Cossio-Aranda J, Guerra-Lopez A, Magana-Serrano J, Iturralde-Torres P Arch Cardiol Mex. 2025; 94(Supl 4):1-75.
PMID: 39928711 PMC: 11824882. DOI: 10.24875/ACM.M25000098.
Pharmacological Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: From Bench to Bedside.
Palandri C, Santini L, Argiro A, Margara F, Doste R, Bueno-Orovio A Drugs. 2022; 82(8):889-912.
PMID: 35696053 PMC: 9209358. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-022-01728-w.
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Review.
Bazan S, Oliveira G, da Silveira C, Reis F, Malagutte K, Tinasi L Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115(5):927-935.
PMID: 33295458 PMC: 8452207. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20190802.
Atrial Fibrillation and Anticoagulation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.
Camm C, Camm A Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2017; 6(2):63-68.
PMID: 28835837 PMC: 5522714. DOI: 10.15420/aer.2017.4.2.
A primer on arrhythmias in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Bockstall K, Link M Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012; 14(5):552-62.
PMID: 22825919 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-012-0297-3.