Use of Public Performance Reports: a Survey of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Context: Publicly released performance reports ("report cards") are expected to foster competition on the basis of quality. Proponents frequently cite the need to inform patient choice of physicians and hospitals as a central element of this strategy.
Objective: To examine the awareness and use of a statewide consumer guide that provides risk-adjusted, in-hospital mortality ratings of hospitals that provide cardiac surgery.
Design: Telephone survey conducted in 1996.
Setting: Pennsylvania, where since 1992, the Pennsylvania Consumer Guide to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft [CABG] Surgery has provided risk-adjusted mortality ratings of all cardiac surgeons and hospitals in the state.
Participants: A total of 474 (70%) of 673 eligible patients who had undergone CABG surgery during the previous year at 1 of 4 hospitals listed in the Consumer Guide as having average mortality rates between 1% and 5% were successfully contacted.
Main Outcome Measures: Patients' awareness of the Consumer Guide, their knowledge of its ratings, their degree of interest in the report, and barriers to its use.
Results: Ninety-three patients (20%) were aware of the Consumer Guide, but only 56 (12%) knew about it before surgery. Among these 56 patients, 18 reported knowing the hospital rating and 7 reported knowing the surgeon rating, 11 said hospital and/or surgeon ratings had a moderate or major impact on their decision making, but only 4 were able to specify either or both correctly. When the Consumer Guide was described to all patients, 264 (56%) were "very" or "somewhat" interested in seeing a copy, and 273 (58%) reported that they probably or definitely would change surgeons if they learned that their surgeon had a higher than expected mortality rate in the previous year. A short time window for decision making and a limited awareness of alternative hospitals within a reasonable distance of home were identified as important barriers to use.
Conclusions: Only 12% of patients surveyed reported awareness of a prominent report on cardiac surgery mortality before undergoing cardiac surgery. Fewer than 1% knew the correct rating of their surgeon or hospital and reported that it had a moderate or major impact on their selection of provider. Efforts to aid patient decision making with performance reports are unlikely to succeed without a tailored and intensive program for dissemination and patient education.
Chen M, Zhang X, Liu C, Chen H, Wang D, Liu C Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1110653.
PMID: 37876730 PMC: 10591321. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1110653.
2022 Reinhardt lecture: The patient's voice as signal.
Cleary P Health Serv Res. 2022; 57(6):1209-1213.
PMID: 36184968 PMC: 9643083. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14078.
Release of individual surgeon data to the public: patients' and surgeons' views.
Harris H, Poole W, Rogers B, Ricketts D Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021; 104(2):106-112.
PMID: 34898292 PMC: 10335083. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0106.
Characterization of US Hospital Advertising and Association With Hospital Performance, 2008-2016.
Ndumele C, Cohen M, Solberg M, Lollo A, Wallace J JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(7):e2115342.
PMID: 34213558 PMC: 8254134. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15342.
Is great information good enough? Evidence from physicians as patients.
Frakes M, Gruber J, Jena A J Health Econ. 2020; 75:102406.
PMID: 33310197 PMC: 7855422. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102406.