» Articles » PMID: 9595973

Incidence and Significance of Neutralizing Antibodies to Interferon Beta-1a in Multiple Sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group (MSCRG)

Overview
Journal Neurology
Specialty Neurology
Date 1998 May 22
PMID 9595973
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Interferon beta is an effective treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). As with other protein drugs, neutralizing antibodies (NAB) can develop that reduce the effectiveness of treatment.

Objectives: To determine the incidence and biological significance of NAB to interferon beta-la (IFN-beta-1a; Avonex; Biogen, Cambridge, MA) in MS patients.

Methods: A two-step assay for NAB to IFN-beta-1a was developed and used to assay serum samples from participants in the phase III clinical trial of IFN-beta-1a, and from patients in an ongoing open-label study of IFN-beta-1a. The biological significance of NAB to IFN-beta-1a was determined by relating the NAB assay result to in vivo induction of the IFN-inducible molecules neopterin and beta-2 microglobulin, and the clinical significance was determined by comparing clinical and MRI measures of disease activity after 2 years of IFN-beta-1a therapy in patients who were NAB+ and NAB-. The incidence of NAB was compared in MS patients who had used only IFN-beta-1a with the incidence in MS patients who had used only IFN-beta-1b.

Results: In patients in the open-label study, development of NAB to IFN-beta-1a resulted in a titer-dependent reduction in neopterin induction after interferon injections. In patients in the phase III study, development of NAB was associated with a reduction in beta-2 microglobulin induction. In the phase III study, a trend toward reduced benefit of IFN-beta-1a on MRI activity in NAB+ versus NAB- patients was observed. The incidence of NAB to IFN-beta-1a in the open-label study was approximately 5% over 24 months of treatment of IFN-beta-1a therapy, but was four- to sixfold higher using the same assay for patients exposed only to IFN-beta-1b for a similar duration. There were no clinical, MRI, or CSF characteristics that were predictive of which patients would develop NAB.

Conclusions: NAB directed against IFN-beta have in vivo biological consequences in patients with MS. The frequency with which MS patients develop NAB against IFN-beta is significantly greater with IFN-beta-1b therapy compared with IFN-beta-1a therapy. Treatment decisions in MS patients treated with IFN-beta should take into account development of NAB.

Citing Articles

A sensitive assay for measuring whole-blood responses to type I IFNs.

Gervais A, Le Floch C, Le Voyer T, Bizien L, Bohlen J, Celmeli F Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(40):e2402983121.

PMID: 39312669 PMC: 11459193. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2402983121.


Human autoantibodies neutralizing type I IFNs: From 1981 to 2023.

Bastard P, Gervais A, Le Voyer T, Philippot Q, Cobat A, Rosain J Immunol Rev. 2024; 322(1):98-112.

PMID: 38193358 PMC: 10950543. DOI: 10.1111/imr.13304.


Anti-cytokine autoantibodies: mechanistic insights and disease associations.

Cheng A, Holland S Nat Rev Immunol. 2023; 24(3):161-177.

PMID: 37726402 DOI: 10.1038/s41577-023-00933-2.


Autoantibodies against type I IFNs in patients with critical influenza pneumonia.

Zhang Q, Pizzorno A, Miorin L, Bastard P, Gervais A, Le Voyer T J Exp Med. 2022; 219(11).

PMID: 36112363 PMC: 9485705. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20220514.


Antidrug Antibodies Against Biological Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis.

Soelberg Sorensen P CNS Drugs. 2022; 36(6):569-589.

PMID: 35590041 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-022-00920-6.