» Articles » PMID: 9591660

Anomalous Mole Fraction Effect, Electrostatics, and Binding in Ionic Channels

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 1998 May 20
PMID 9591660
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ionic channels bathed in mixed solutions of two permeant electrolytes often conduct less current than channels bathed in pure solutions of either. For many years, this anomalous mole fraction effect (AMFE) has been thought to occur only in single-file pores containing two or more ions at a time. Most thinking about channels incorporates this view. We show here that the AMFE arises naturally, as an electrostatic consequence of localized ion specific binding, if the average current through a channel is described by a theory (Poisson-Nernst-Planck, PNP) that computes the average electric field from the average concentration of charges in and near the channel. The theory contains only those ion-ion interactions mediated by the mean field, and it does not enforce single filing. The AMFE is predicted by PNP over a wide range of mean concentrations of ions in the channel; for example, it is predicted when (on the average) less, or much less, than one ion is found in the channel's pore. In this treatment, the AMFE arises, in large measure, from a depletion layer produced near a region of ion-specific binding. The small excess concentration of ions in the binding region repels all nearby ions of like charge, thereby creating a depletion layer. The overall conductance of the channel arises in effect from resistors in series, one from the binding region, one from the depletion zone, and one from the unbinding region. The highest value resistor (which occurs in the depletion zone) limits the overall series conductance. Here the AMFE is not the result of single filing or multiple occupancy, and so previous views of permeation need to be revised: the presence of an AMFE does not imply that ions permeate single file through a multiply occupied pore.

Citing Articles

Modeling the Device Behavior of Biological and Synthetic Nanopores with Reduced Models.

Boda D, Valisko M, Gillespie D Entropy (Basel). 2020; 22(11).

PMID: 33287027 PMC: 7711659. DOI: 10.3390/e22111259.


A thermodynamic description for physiological transmembrane transport.

Herrera-Valdez M F1000Res. 2021; 7:1468.

PMID: 30542618 PMC: 6259595. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.16169.3.


Selective ion permeation involves complexation with carboxylates and lysine in a model human sodium channel.

Flood E, Boiteux C, Allen T PLoS Comput Biol. 2018; 14(9):e1006398.

PMID: 30208027 PMC: 6152994. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006398.


Comparison of permeation mechanisms in sodium-selective ion channels.

Boiteux C, Flood E, Allen T Neurosci Lett. 2018; 700:3-8.

PMID: 29807068 PMC: 6592624. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.05.036.


The enduring legacy of the "constant-field equation" in membrane ion transport.

Alvarez O, Latorre R J Gen Physiol. 2017; 149(10):911-920.

PMID: 28931632 PMC: 5688357. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201711839.


References
1.
Bratko , Henderson , BLUM . Limiting law for ion adsorption in narrow planar pores. Phys Rev A. 1991; 44(12):8235-8241. DOI: 10.1103/physreva.44.8235. View

2.
Chen D, Xu L, Tripathy A, Meissner G, Eisenberg B . Permeation through the calcium release channel of cardiac muscle. Biophys J. 1997; 73(3):1337-54. PMC: 1181034. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78167-0. View

3.
Hille B, Schwarz W . Potassium channels as multi-ion single-file pores. J Gen Physiol. 1978; 72(4):409-42. PMC: 2228548. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.72.4.409. View

4.
Warshel A, Russell S . Calculations of electrostatic interactions in biological systems and in solutions. Q Rev Biophys. 1984; 17(3):283-422. DOI: 10.1017/s0033583500005333. View

5.
Neher E, Sakmann B . Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres. Nature. 1976; 260(5554):799-802. DOI: 10.1038/260799a0. View