» Articles » PMID: 9590417

Efficiency and Efficacy of the Electrogastrogram

Overview
Journal Dig Dis Sci
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1998 May 20
PMID 9590417
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The efficiency and efficacy of the electrogastrogram (EGG) involve a few practical factors, including recording length, sample size, and the characteristics of subjects. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of these factors on the accuracy of EGG analysis. Gastric myoelectrical activity was recorded using electrogastrography in 24 subjects (ages 22-91 years) for 1 hr in the fasting state and 2 hr after a test meal. Computerized spectral analysis was performed to compute EGG parameters, including dominant frequency, dominant power, and the percentage of 2-4 cycles per minute (cpm) slow waves. A parameter called misinterpretation was defined to investigate the effect of recording length. The results were as follows: (1) Using the recording length of 1 hr in each state as a gold standard, the misinterpretation for the recording length of 30 min was 27% for the dominant frequency and 17% for the dominant power. When the recording length was reduced to 15 min, the misinterpretation increased to 61% for the dominant frequency and 38% for the dominant power. (2) With a sample size of 10 subjects and a recording length of 60 min, a statistically significant postprandial increase was observed in the dominant frequency and power, and a trend in the postprandial increase of the regularity of the EGG was noted. When the sample size increased to 24 subjects, a significant postprandial increase was found in all these parameters. (3) None of the EGG parameters exhibited any significant difference between the younger and older subjects or between men and women. In conclusion, a recording length of 30-60 min seems to be appropriate and produces reliable and predictable results. Age and gender do not affect any of the EGG parameters.

Citing Articles

A Low-Noise Low-Power 0.001Hz-1kHz Neural Recording System-on-Chip With Sample-Level Duty-Cycling.

Wu J, Akinin A, Somayajulu J, Lee M, Paul A, Lu H IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2024; 18(2):263-273.

PMID: 38408002 PMC: 11062612. DOI: 10.1109/TBCAS.2024.3368068.


EGG DWPack: System for Multi-Channel Electrogastrographic Signals Recording and Analysis.

Komorowski D J Med Syst. 2018; 42(11):201.

PMID: 30225785 PMC: 6153734. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-018-1035-1.


Gastric Function in Children with Oesophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula.

Duvoisin G, Krishnan U Front Pediatr. 2017; 5:76.

PMID: 28447027 PMC: 5388682. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2017.00076.


Electrogastrography in adults and children: the strength, pitfalls, and clinical significance of the cutaneous recording of the gastric electrical activity.

Riezzo G, Russo F, Indrio F Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013:282757.

PMID: 23762836 PMC: 3677658. DOI: 10.1155/2013/282757.


Electrogastrography: methodology, validation and applications.

Yin J, Chen J J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013; 19(1):5-17.

PMID: 23350042 PMC: 3548127. DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.1.5.


References
1.
Takayasu H, Harasawa S, Miwa T, Yamada Y . [Investigation of gastric function and prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia]. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 1993; 90(4):743-54. View

2.
Abell T, Malagelada J, Lucas A, Brown M, Camilleri M, Go V . Gastric electromechanical and neurohormonal function in anorexia nervosa. Gastroenterology. 1987; 93(5):958-65. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(87)90557-9. View

3.
Gross D, Grassino A, Ross W, Macklem P . Electromyogram pattern of diaphragmatic fatigue. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979; 46(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1979.46.1.1. View

4.
Chen J, Richards R, McCallum R . Identification of gastric contractions from the cutaneous electrogastrogram. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994; 89(1):79-85. View

5.
Pfaffenbach B, Adamek R, Kuhn K, Wegener M . Electrogastrography in healthy subjects. Evaluation of normal values, influence of age and gender. Dig Dis Sci. 1995; 40(7):1445-50. DOI: 10.1007/BF02285190. View