Automatic Matching of Homologous Histological Sections
Overview
Biophysics
Authors
Affiliations
The role of neuroanatomical atlases is undergoing a significant redefinition as digital atlases become available. These have the potential to serve as more than passive guides and to hold the role of directing segmentation and multimodal fusion of experimental data. Key elements needed to support these new tasks are registration algorithms. For images derived from histological procedures, the need is for techniques to map the two-dimensional (2-D) images of the sectional material into the reference atlas which may be a full three-dimensional (3-D) data set or one consisting of a series of 2-D images. A variety of 2-D-2-D registration methods are available to align experimental images with the atlas once the corresponding plane of section through the atlas has been identified. Methods to automate the identification of the homologous plane, however, have not been previously reported. In this paper we use the external section contour to drive the identification and registration procedure. For this purpose, we model the contours by B-splines because of their attractive properties the most important of which are: 1) smoothness and continuity; 2) local controllability which implies that local changes in shape are confined to the B-spline parameters local to that change; 3) shape invariance under affine transformation, which means that the affine transformed curve is still a B-spline whose control points are related to the object control points through the transformation. In this paper we present a fast algorithm for estimating the control points of the B-spline which is robust to nonuniform sampling, noise, and local deformations. Curve matching is achieved by using a similarity measure that depends directly on the parameters of the B-spline. Performance tests are reported using histological material from rat brains.
Optimized SIFTFlow for registration of whole-mount histology to reference optical images.
Shojaii R, Martel A J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016; 3(4):047501.
PMID: 27774494 PMC: 5069282. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.4.047501.
Ropireddy D, Bachus S, Ascoli G Neuroscience. 2012; 205:91-111.
PMID: 22245503 PMC: 3299877. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.12.055.
Ceritoglu C, Wang L, Selemon L, Csernansky J, Miller M, Ratnanather J Front Hum Neurosci. 2010; 4:43.
PMID: 20577633 PMC: 2889720. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00043.
Li X, Yankeelov T, Rosen G, Gore J, Dawant B Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 27(3):401-16.
PMID: 18786794 PMC: 2690703. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.07.016.
Brain maps on the go: functional imaging during motor challenge in animals.
Holschneider D, Maarek J Methods. 2008; 45(4):255-61.
PMID: 18554522 PMC: 2561174. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.04.006.