» Articles » PMID: 957167

Transduction Properties of Tracheal Stretch Receptors

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1976 Jun 1
PMID 957167
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. Using single fibre vagal afferent recording, we have studied the behavior of slowly adapting stretch receptors located in an isolated, in situ, segment of the trachea in dogs. Responses to positive and negative steady and oscillating transmural pressures were investigated. 2. Seventy-eight per cent of the receptors studied were tonically active at resting tracheal volume. Ninety per cent showed a more pronounced response to positive than to negative transmural pressures. 3. During pressure oscillations the majority of the receptors had a higher discharge frequency at any given pressure during the ascending phase of the pressure wave than at the same pressure under static conditions. During most of the ensuing descent of pressure toward zero the discharge frequency led transmural pressure. 4. With increasing frequency of oscillation the differences from the static responses increased (dP/dt sensitivity), especially during the ascending limb of the pressure oscillation (rectifying behavior). 5. In a small number of receptors, discharge frequency lagged behind transmural pressure or was in phase with it ("no loop" pattern). 6. In three cases the same receptor exhibited dP/dt sensitivity during positive pressure oscillations, whereas discharge frequency lagged behind pressure during negative pressure oscillations. This indicates that the lack of dP/dt sensitivity exhibited under negative pressure conditions does not represent an intrinsic property of these receptors, but reflects some aspect of their mechanical arrangement within the airway wall. 7. THESE PATTERNS OF RESPONSE ARE DISCUSSed in terms of intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of the receptors. 8. The physiological implications of stretch receptor behaviour are also considered.

Citing Articles

Mechanosensitivity of Murine Lung Slowly Adapting Receptors: Minimal Impact of Chemosensory, Serotonergic, and Purinergic Signaling.

Domnik N, Vincent S, Fisher J Front Physiol. 2022; 13:833665.

PMID: 35250636 PMC: 8889033. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.833665.


Coordination of Respiration, Swallowing, and Chewing in Healthy Young Adults.

Hao N, Sasa A, Kulvanich S, Nakajima Y, Nagoya K, Magara J Front Physiol. 2021; 12:696071.

PMID: 34326780 PMC: 8313873. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.696071.


Hypertonic saline stimulates vagal afferents that respond to lung deflation.

Guardiola J, Saad M, Yu J Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2019; 317(6):R814-R817.

PMID: 31596107 PMC: 6962621. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00064.2019.


Vagal Afferent Innervation of the Airways in Health and Disease.

Mazzone S, Undem B Physiol Rev. 2016; 96(3):975-1024.

PMID: 27279650 PMC: 4982036. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00039.2015.


The course of lung inflation alters the central pattern of tracheobronchial cough in cat-The evidence for volume feedback during cough.

Poliacek I, Simera M, Veternik M, Kotmanova Z, Pitts T, Hanacek J Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2016; 229:43-50.

PMID: 27125979 PMC: 5369651. DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2016.04.008.


References
1.
ADRIAN E . Afferent impulses in the vagus and their effect on respiration. J Physiol. 1933; 79(3):332-58. PMC: 1394842. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1933.sp003053. View

2.
BENDIXEN H, Smith G, Mead J . PATTERN OF VENTILATION IN YOUNG ADULTS. J Appl Physiol. 1964; 19:195-8. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1964.19.2.195. View

3.
Cooper S . The responses of the primary and secondary endings of muscle spindles with intact motor innervation during applied stretch. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1961; 46:389-98. DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.1961.sp001558. View

4.
Davis H, FOWLER W, LAMBERT E . Effect of volume and rate of inflation and deflation on transpulmonary pressure and response of pulmonary stretch receptors. Am J Physiol. 1956; 187(3):558-66. DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1956.187.3.558. View

5.
Widdicombe J . Receptors in the trachea and bronchi of the cat. J Physiol. 1954; 123(1):71-104. PMC: 1366155. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005034. View