» Articles » PMID: 9570993

A Phase II Trial of Intraperitoneal Cisplatin and Etoposide As Consolidation Therapy in Patients with Stage II-IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Following Negative Surgical Assessment

Overview
Journal Gynecol Oncol
Date 1998 May 8
PMID 9570993
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of three courses of intraperitoneal (i.p.) cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide (VP-16) as consolidation therapy following pathologically negative second-look surgical reassessment for Stage IIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Patients And Methods: Between September 1988 and April 1996, 40 patients were treated with three cycles of i.p. CDDP (100 mg/m2)/VP-16 (200 mg/m2) as consolidation therapy. Survival was compared to that of a group of 46 contemporaneous patients undergoing observation only.

Results: Median age of the 36 eligible patients was 52 years (range 30-70 years). Stage distribution was II (3), III (31), and IV (2); histologic grade was 1 (2), 2 (7), 3 (25), and not recorded (2); and residual disease at completion of initial surgery was none/microscopic in 13/36 (36%) patients. Median age of the 46 patients who did not receive consolidation was 52 years (range, 27-80 years); stage distribution was II (18), III (26), and IV (2); histologic grade was 1 (5), 2 (12), 3 (28), and not recorded (1). With a median follow-up of 36 months in both groups, 14/36 (39%) of the protocol group have recurred compared with 25/46 (54%) of those undergoing observation alone. Median disease-free survival (DFS) for the observed patients is 28.5 months and has not been reached in the consolidation group. Disease-free survival distribution between the two groups was compared using the log-rank test and was found to be significant (P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that the only significant predictor of improved DFS was protocol treatment (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Intraperitoneal consolidation with CDDP/VP-16 following negative second-look reassessment in patients with advanced EOC resulted in a significant increase in DFS compared to nonprotocol patients treated concurrently who underwent observation alone.

Citing Articles

Surgical second-look in epithelial ovarian cancer: high recurrence rate after negative results and lack of survival benefit limits its role in standard management.

Taskin S, Gungor M, Taskin E, Ortac F J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2014; 12(1):21-5.

PMID: 24591952 PMC: 3939285. DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2011.05.


Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapeutics.

Hasovits C, Clarke S Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012; 51(4):203-24.

PMID: 22420577 DOI: 10.2165/11598890-000000000-00000.


Continued chemotherapy after complete response to primary therapy among women with advanced ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Hess L, Rong N, Monahan P, Gupta P, Thomaskutty C, Matei D Cancer. 2010; 116(22):5251-60.

PMID: 20665885 PMC: 3740230. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25487.


Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of ovarian cancer: focus on carboplatin.

Markman M Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009; 5(1):161-8.

PMID: 19436618 PMC: 2697524. DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s4186.


A Randomized Study of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Is Chemotherapy Useful after Complete Remission?.

Nicoletto M, Tumolo S, Falci C, Donach M, Visona E, Rosabian A Int J Med Sci. 2005; 1(2):116-125.

PMID: 15912203 PMC: 1074719. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.1.116.