» Articles » PMID: 9536356

Eye Movement Control During Reading: a Simulation of Some Word-targeting Strategies

Overview
Journal Vision Res
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 1998 Apr 16
PMID 9536356
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

McConkie, Kerr, Reddix, & Zola [(1988). Vision Research, 28, 1107-1118] demonstrated that the distributions of landing sites on a word tended to be gaussian in shape. They provided a detailed account of the behaviour of the eye once a target had been selected and a saccade initiated, but said little about the process of target selection itself. The purpose of this study was to take as a starting point the landing site distributions of McConkie et al., in particular the residuals derived from fitting the gaussians to the empirical data, and to explore by computer simulation a number of saccade targeting strategies in order to discover candidates that best accounted for the residual data. Our results indicate that the strategy that gives the best fit involves targeting the longest word in a right parafoveal window extending 20 characters to the right of the currently fixated word. The implications of this finding for models of reading are discussed.

Citing Articles

A beginner's guide to eye tracking for psycholinguistic studies of reading.

Schotter E, Dillon B Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(2):68.

PMID: 39843882 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02572-4.


Lexical Processing Strongly Affects Reading Times But Not Skipping During Natural Reading.

Heilbron M, van Haren J, Hagoort P, de Lange F Open Mind (Camb). 2023; 7:757-783.

PMID: 37840763 PMC: 10575561. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00099.


Cortical control of eye movements in natural reading: Evidence from MVPA.

Goold J, Choi W, Henderson J Exp Brain Res. 2019; 237(12):3099-3107.

PMID: 31541285 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05655-3.


Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eye-movement control during reading.

Albrengues C, Lavigne F, Aguilar C, Castet E, Vitu F PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0219666.

PMID: 31329614 PMC: 6645505. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219666.


Failure to detect function word repetitions and omissions in reading: Are eye movements to blame?.

Staub A, Dodge S, Cohen A Psychon Bull Rev. 2018; 26(1):340-346.

PMID: 29869026 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1492-z.