» Articles » PMID: 9500306

Volume of Ethanol Consumption: Effects of Different Approaches to Measurement

Overview
Journal J Stud Alcohol
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 1998 Mar 21
PMID 9500306
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Eight different approaches to measuring alcohol consumption were compared in terms of average daily volume of ethanol intake, selected percentiles of the volume distribution, the proportion of drinkers exceeding a volume-based cutpoint for moderate drinking and the estimated association between volume of intake and alcohol use disorders.

Method: Data were drawn from the 1988 National Health Interview Survey and the 1992 National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey. The eight approaches compared overall and beverage-specific questions, reference periods of varying lengths, and measures based solely on usual intake with those that incorporated different aspects of atypical heavy drinking.

Results: Average daily ethanol intake ranged from 0.43 oz based on two questions on current usual frequency and quantity of drinking (assuming 0.5 oz of ethanol per drink) to 0.72 oz based on 21 questions that included usual and heaviest consumption of beer, wine and distilled spirits in the year preceding interview.

Conclusions: Estimated volume was highly sensitive to the number and types of questions upon which it was based, and changes in formulation that resulted in relatively small increases in mean volume often were associated with much larger increases in the proportion of drinkers exceeding some specified level of intake and in the estimated association between consumption and alcohol use disorders. These issues should be considered when deciding on the consumption items to be included in alcohol surveys.

Citing Articles

High Intensity Drinking (HID) Assessed by Maximum Quantity Consumed Is an Important Pattern Measure Adding Predictive Value in Higher and Lower Income Societies for Modeling Alcohol-Related Problems.

Greenfield T, Lui C, Cook W, Karriker-Jaffe K, Li L, Wilsnack S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(4).

PMID: 36834453 PMC: 9958696. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043748.


Why Is Per Capita Consumption Underestimated in Alcohol Surveys? Results from 39 Surveys in 23 European Countries.

Kilian C, Manthey J, Probst C, Brunborg G, Bye E, Ekholm O Alcohol Alcohol. 2020; 55(5):554-563.

PMID: 32491170 PMC: 7427154. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agaa048.


Sources of Error in Substance Use Prevalence Surveys.

Johnson T Int Sch Res Notices. 2016; 2014:923290.

PMID: 27437511 PMC: 4897110. DOI: 10.1155/2014/923290.


The National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) Waves 1 and 2: review and summary of findings.

Hasin D, Grant B Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015; 50(11):1609-40.

PMID: 26210739 PMC: 4618096. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-015-1088-0.


Measuring alcohol consumption for genomic meta-analyses of alcohol intake: opportunities and challenges.

Agrawal A, Freedman N, Cheng Y, Lin P, Shaffer J, Sun Q Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 95(3):539-47.

PMID: 22301922 PMC: 3278237. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.111.015545.