» Articles » PMID: 9493921

Sleep in the Laboratory and Sleep at Home: Comparisons of Older Insomniacs and Normal Sleepers

Overview
Journal Sleep
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 1998 Mar 11
PMID 9493921
Citations 65
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many laboratory polysomnographic (LPSG) studies have shown only modest sleep differences between insomniacs and matched, noncomplaining normal controls. However, the extent to which LPSG methodology affects the outcome of such comparisons has yet to be tested. In the current investigation, 32 (16 females, 16 males) older (age > or = 60 years) insomniacs and an age-matched and gender-matched sample of 32 noncomplaining normal sleepers underwent three consecutive nights of LPSG monitoring and another three consecutive nights of PSG monitoring in their homes (HPSG). By random assignment, one-half of the subjects in each group underwent LPSG first, whereas the remaining subjects underwent HPSG first. Each PSG recording was blindly scored using conventional scoring criteria, and resulting measures of total sleep period, total sleep time, sleep efficiency percent, stage 1 time, slow-wave sleep time, and rapid eye movement latency were used to compare the two subject groups within each PSG recording site (i.e. lab and home). Statistical analyses showed the normals sleepers and insomniacs evidenced similar pronounced first night effects (FNEs) when undergoing LPSG. However, neither mean values of the selected sleep parameters nor measures reflecting their night-to-night variability differentiated the insomniacs from the normal sleepers when such measures were derived from LPSG. In contrast, FNEs were generally absent for both subject groups when they underwent HPSG. Moreover, the insomniacs displayed significantly greater variability in several of their sleep measures during HPSG than did the normal sleepers. Overall, results suggest FNEs are a concern mainly when using LPSG, and HPSG may be more sensitive than LPSG for documenting sleep differences between normal sleepers and insomniacs. Additional studies are needed to determine if the findings reported herein are similar for young and middle-aged adults.

Citing Articles

Mobile Sleep Lab: Comparison of polysomnographic parameters with a conventional sleep laboratory.

Suzuki C, Suzuki Y, Abe T, Kanbayashi T, Fukusumi S, Kokubo T PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0316579.

PMID: 39775303 PMC: 11706495. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316579.


Semi automatic quantification of REM sleep without atonia in natural sleep environment.

Possti D, Oz S, Gerston A, Wasserman D, Duncan I, Cesari M NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):341.

PMID: 39609533 PMC: 11605064. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01354-8.


A randomized study on the effect of a wearable device using 0.75 Hz transcranial electrical stimulation on sleep onset insomnia.

Simons S, Provo M, Yanoschak A, Schmidt C, Gerrard I, Weisend M Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1427462.

PMID: 39507801 PMC: 11537953. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1427462.


Level 2 Polysomnography for the Diagnosis of Sleep Disorders: A Health Technology Assessment.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2024; 24(7):1-157.

PMID: 39372311 PMC: 11450293.


Study on OSA screening and influencing factors in community-based elderly hypertensive patients based on single-lead wearable ECG devices.

Yu X, Guan L, Su P, Zhang Q, Guo X, Li T Sleep Breath. 2024; 28(6):2445-2456.

PMID: 39207664 DOI: 10.1007/s11325-024-03136-8.