Neitzke C, Chandi S, Gausden E, Debbi E, Sculco P, Chalmers B
Arthroplast Today. 2024; 27:101347.
PMID: 39071827
PMC: 11282418.
DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101347.
Meermans G, Fawley D, Zagra L, Ten Broeke R, Johnson K, Bernard T
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024; 25(1):25.
PMID: 38727945
PMC: 11087417.
DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00766-2.
Park J, Park J, Kim H, Lee Y, Han K, Ha Y
Clin Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(1):16-22.
PMID: 38304220
PMC: 10825242.
DOI: 10.4055/cios21219.
Yi N, Yuan H, Xu N, Liu R, Wang Y, Zhuang C
BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):27.
PMID: 38238716
PMC: 10795370.
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02297-9.
Trung H, Vo Sy Quyen N, Tu N, Trung D, Dinh T
BMC Surg. 2023; 23(1):369.
PMID: 38066450
PMC: 10704642.
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02281-3.
Registration in the supine position improve the accuracy of cup placement in total hip arthroplasty using a portable navigation system.
Naito Y, Hasegawa M, Tone S, Wakabayashi H, Sudo A
Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20222.
PMID: 37980455
PMC: 10657446.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47674-9.
Determining the orientation of acetabular prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty by refering to the anatomical landmarker of acetabular notches.
Zhang H, Zhou J, Ling X, Chen H, Du M, Zhao J
Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):6185.
PMID: 37061581
PMC: 10105719.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33501-8.
Abnormal spinopelvic mobility as a risk factor for acetabular placement error in total hip arthroplasty using optical computer-assisted surgical navigation system.
Jang S, Vigdorchik J, Windsor E, Schwarzkopf R, Mayman D, Sculco P
Bone Jt Open. 2022; 3(6):475-484.
PMID: 35694779
PMC: 9233429.
DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.36.BJO-2022-0055.
Cup placement in primary total hip arthroplasty: how to get it right without navigation or robotics.
Meermans G, Grammatopoulos G, Innmann M, Beverland D
EFORT Open Rev. 2022; 7(6):365-374.
PMID: 35638598
PMC: 9257731.
DOI: 10.1530/EOR-22-0025.
A method combining the use of a mobile application and a dedicated pelvic positioner for acetabular cup insertion.
Kamimura A, Enokida M, Enokida S, Nagashima H
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022; 17(1):251.
PMID: 35505410
PMC: 9066926.
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03138-w.
Does accelerometer-based portable navigation provide more accurate and precise cup orientation without prosthetic impingement than conventional total hip arthroplasty? A randomized controlled study.
Kiyohara M, Hamai S, Shiomoto K, Harada S, Harada T, Motomura G
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022; 17(6):1007-1015.
PMID: 35347564
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-022-02592-5.
Differences in the setting of acetabular component alignment guides between the supine and lateral positions for total hip arthroplasty.
Minoda Y, Sugama R, Ohta Y, Takemura S, Yamamoto N, Nakatsuchi T
Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):21978.
PMID: 34754017
PMC: 8578565.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01420-1.
Mechanical and Anatomical Alignment Guide Techniques Are Superior to Freehand in Achieving Target Orientation of an Acetabular Component.
Bruce-Brand R, Magill P, ONeill C, Karayiannis P, Hill J, Beverland D
Arthroplast Today. 2021; 11:222-228.
PMID: 34692959
PMC: 8516817.
DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.08.016.
Hydroxyapatite-coated cementless total hip arthroplasty for patients undergoing dialysis: a study of 30 hips with a minimum follow-up period of 5 years.
Hashimoto A, Sonohata M, Kii S, Kawano S, Mawatari M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):842.
PMID: 34592965
PMC: 8485528.
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04718-3.
Intraoperative measurement of acetabular component position using imageless navigation during revision total hip arthroplasty.
Mei X, Etemad-Rezaie A, Safir O, Gross A, Kuzyk P
Can J Surg. 2021; 64(4):E442-E448.
PMID: 34388106
PMC: 8519496.
DOI: 10.1503/cjs.012420.
Who Restores Hip Biomechanics More Effectively after a Femoral Neck Fracture? Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasties Performed by Either Hip Surgeons or Orthopaedic Residents.
Diaz-Dilernia F, Garcia-Mansilla A, Llano L, Buljubasich M, Onativia J, Slullitel P
Arthroplast Today. 2020; 6(4):736-741.
PMID: 32923560
PMC: 7475170.
DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.07.027.
Computerised tomography-based planning with conventional total hip arthroplasty versus robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Ayuob A, Haddad F
Trials. 2020; 21(1):776.
PMID: 32912292
PMC: 7488173.
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04702-7.
Digitalized analyses of intraoperative acetabular component position using image-matching technique in total hip arthroplasty.
Kawahara S, Hara T, Sato T, Kitade K, Shimoto T, Nakamura T
Bone Joint Res. 2020; 9(7):360-367.
PMID: 32728432
PMC: 7376306.
DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.97.BJR-2019-0260.R2.
Positioning of the acetabular component in cemented prostheses - radiographic calculation.
Labronici P, Motta R, Esteves B, Franco J, Hoffmann R, Ferreira L
Rev Bras Ortop. 2019; 48(1):62-68.
PMID: 31304113
PMC: 6565920.
DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2012.04.001.
Non-equivalent Results from Different Anteversion Measurements Methods for the Evaluation of the Acetabular Cup Orientation in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Snijders T, Schlosser T, van Gaalen S, Castelein R, Weinans H, de Gast A
Orthop Surg. 2019; 11(2):241-247.
PMID: 30932341
PMC: 6594505.
DOI: 10.1111/os.12445.