» Articles » PMID: 9459232

The Effect of Timing of Ondansetron Administration on Its Efficacy, Cost-effectiveness, and Cost-benefit As a Prophylactic Antiemetic in the Ambulatory Setting

Overview
Journal Anesth Analg
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 1998 Feb 12
PMID 9459232
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Although ondansetron (4 mg I.V.) is effective in the prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after ambulatory surgery, the optimal timing of its administration, the cost-effectiveness, the cost-benefits, and the effect on the patient's quality of life after discharge have not been established. In this placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 164 healthy women undergoing outpatient gynecological laparoscopic procedures with a standardized anesthetic were randomized to receive placebo (Group A), ondansetron 2 mg at the start of and 2 mg after surgery (Group B), ondansetron 4 mg before induction (Group C), or ondansetron 4 mg after surgery (Group D). The effects of these regimens on the incidence, severity, and costs associated with PONV and discharge characteristics were determined, along with the patient's willingness to pay for antiemetics. Compared with ondansetron given before induction of anesthesia, the administration of ondansetron after surgery was associated with lower nausea scores, earlier intake of normal food, decreased incidence of frequent emesis (more than two episodes), and increased times until 25% of patients failed prophylactic antiemetic therapy (i.e., had an emetic episode or received rescue antiemetics for severe nausea) during the first 24 h postoperatively. This prophylactic regimen was also associated with the highest patient satisfaction and lowest cost-effectiveness ratios. Compared with the placebo group, ondansetron administered after surgery significantly reduced the incidence of PONV in the postanesthesia care unit and during the 24-h follow-up period and facilitated the recovery process by reducing the time to oral intake, ambulation, discharge readiness, resuming regular fluid intake and a normal diet. When ondansetron was given as a "split dose," its prophylactic antiemetic efficacy was not significantly different from that of the placebo group. In conclusion, the prophylactic administration of ondansetron after surgery, rather than before induction, may be associated with increased patient benefits.

Implications: Ondansetron 4 mg I.V. administered immediately before the end of surgery was the most efficacious in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting, facilitating both early and late recovery, and improving patient satisfaction after outpatient laparoscopy.

Citing Articles

Associations between ondansetron and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and food intake in Japanese female undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a retrospective study.

Shirozu K, Umehara K, Takamori S, Takase S, Yamaura K J Anesth. 2023; 38(2):185-190.

PMID: 38108920 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-023-03295-0.


The Effectiveness of Ondansetron and Dexamethasone in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Qasemi F, Aini T, Ali W, Dost W, Rasully M, Anwari M Cureus. 2023; 15(4):e37419.

PMID: 37181978 PMC: 10174678. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37419.


Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.

Weibel S, Rucker G, Eberhart L, Pace N, Hartl H, Jordan O Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 10:CD012859.

PMID: 33075160 PMC: 8094506. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.


Management strategies for the treatment and prevention of postoperative/postdischarge nausea and vomiting: an updated review.

Elvir-Lazo O, White P, Yumul R, Cruz Eng H F1000Res. 2020; 9.

PMID: 32913634 PMC: 7429924. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.21832.1.


Scheduled injection of ramosetron for prevention of nausea and vomiting following single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Li S, Wang Y, Choi S, Jung Y, Han K, Chung I Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019; 62(5):344-351.

PMID: 31538078 PMC: 6737055. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.5.344.