» Articles » PMID: 9447729

An Optimization Model for Mastication and Swallowing in Mammals

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 1998 Feb 3
PMID 9447729
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mammalian mastication is a process combining simultaneous food comminution and lubrication. The initiation of swallowing, which is voluntary, has been thought to depend on separate thresholds for food particle size and for particle lubrication. Instead of this duality, we suggest that swallowing is initiated when it is sensed that a batch of food particles is binding together under viscous forces so as to form a bolus. Bolus formation ensures that when the food mass is swallowed, it will pass the pharyngeal region safely without risk of inhaling small particles into the lower respiratory tract. Crucial for bolus formation is food particle size reduction by mastication. This allows the tongue to pack particles together tightly by pressure against the hard palate. A major function of salivation is to fill the gradually reducing spaces between particles, so increasing viscous cohesion and promoting bolus formation. If swallowing is delayed, excessive saliva floods the bolus, separating particles and reducing cohesion. Swallowing then becomes more precarious. Our model suggests that there is an optimum moment for a mammal to swallow, defined in terms of a peak cohesive force between food particles. The model is tested on human mastication with two foods, brazil nut and raw carrot, which have very different particle size breakdown rates. The peak cohesive force is much greater with brazil nuts but both foods are predicted to be swallowed after similar numbers of chews despite the very different food particle size reductions achieved at that stage. The predicted number of chews to swallow is in broad agreement with published data.

Citing Articles

Association Between Dietary Variety and Masticatory Behaviors Measured Using Wearable Device Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Japan: A Multilevel Meal-by-Meal Analysis.

Eguchi K, Shirobe M, Iwasaki M, Motokawa K, Gomi T, Kalantar L Nutrients. 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40005023 PMC: 11858430. DOI: 10.3390/nu17040695.


The Oral Microbial Ecosystem in Age-Related Xerostomia: A Critical Review.

Pei X, Zhou L, Tsang M, Tai W, Wong S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23.

PMID: 39684528 PMC: 11640827. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252312815.


Effects of healthy aging on tongue-jaw kinematics during feeding behavior in rhesus macaques.

Punacha S, Huang K, Arce-McShane F bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39131307 PMC: 11312521. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.31.605680.


Risk factors and prevention of choking.

Saccomanno S, Saran S, Paskay L, De Luca M, Tricerri A, Mafucci Orlandini S Eur J Transl Myol. 2023; 33(4).

PMID: 37905785 PMC: 10811631. DOI: 10.4081/ejtm.2023.11471.


Teeth and the gastrointestinal tract in mammals: when 1 + 1 = 3.

Clauss M, Fritz J, Hummel J Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1891):20220544.

PMID: 37839451 PMC: 10577037. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0544.


References
1.
RINGEL R, Ewanowski S . Oral perception. I. Two-point discrimination. J Speech Hear Res. 1965; 8(4):389-98. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.0804.389. View

2.
YURKSTAS A, MANLY R . Value of different test foods in estimating masticatory ability. J Appl Physiol. 1950; 3(1):45-53. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1950.3.1.45. View

3.
Glantz P . The surface tension of saliva. Odontol Revy. 1970; 21(2):119-27. View

4.
Laine P, Siirila H . Oral and manual stereognosis and two-point tactile discrimination of the tongue. Acta Odontol Scand. 1971; 29(2):197-204. DOI: 10.3109/00016357109026515. View

5.
Hrycyshyn A, BASMAJIAN J . Electromyography of the oral stage of swallowing in man. Am J Anat. 1972; 133(3):333-40. DOI: 10.1002/aja.1001330307. View