» Articles » PMID: 9442950

Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cattle in Ontario: Frequency of Occurrence and Bacteriological Isolates

Overview
Journal Can Vet J
Date 1998 Jan 27
PMID 9442950
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the frequency of occurrence of clinical mastitis in dairy herds in Ontario. The study group consisted of 65 dairy farms involved in a 2-year observational study, which included recording all clinical mastitis cases and milk sampling of quarters with clinical mastitis. Lactational incidence risks of 9.8% for abnormal milk only, 8.2% for abnormal milk with a hard or swollen udder, and 4.4% for abnormal milk plus systemic signs of illness related to mastitis were calculated for 2840 cows and heifers. Overall, 19.8% of cows experienced one or more cases of clinical mastitis during location. Teat injuries occurred in 2.1% of lactations. Standard bacteriology was performed on pretreatment milk samples from 834 cows with clinical mastitis. The bacteria isolated were Staphylococcus aureus (6.7%), Streptococcus agalactiae (0.7%), other Streptococcus spp. (14.1%), coliforms (17.2%), gram-positive bacilli (5.5%), Corynebacterium bovis (1.7%), and other Staphylococcus spp. (28.7%). There was no growth in 17.7% of samples, and 8.3% of samples were contaminated. Clinical mastitis is a common disease in dairy cows in Ontario; approximately 1 in 5 cow lactations have at lease one episode of clinical mastitis. There is, however, considerable variation in the incidence of clinical mastitis among farms. The majority of 1st cases of clinical mastitis occur early in lactation, and the risk of clinical mastitis increases with increasing parity. Environmental, contagious, and minor pathogens were all associated with cases of clinical mastitis.

Citing Articles

Invited review: integration of technologies and systems for precision animal agriculture-a case study on precision dairy farming.

Kaur U, Malacco V, Bai H, Price T, Datta A, Xin L J Anim Sci. 2023; 101.

PMID: 37335911 PMC: 10370899. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad206.


Evaluation of a Novel Infrared Thermography Projection to Assess Udder Health in Primigravid Dairy Heifers.

Simoes P, Viora L, Pepler P, Geraghty T, McCafferty D, Zadoks R Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(23).

PMID: 36496931 PMC: 9738602. DOI: 10.3390/ani12233410.


Spatio-Temporal Variation in the Prevalence of Major Mastitis Pathogens Isolated From Bovine Milk Samples Between 2008 and 2017 in Ontario, Canada.

Acharya K, Brankston G, Slavic D, Greer A Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:742696.

PMID: 34805334 PMC: 8595243. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.742696.


Antimicrobial resistance in mastitis, respiratory and enteric bacteria isolated from ruminant animals from the Atlantic Provinces of Canada from 1994-2013.

Awosile B, Heider L, Saab M, McClure J Can Vet J. 2018; 59(10):1099-1104.

PMID: 30510316 PMC: 6135275.


Estimated antimicrobial dispensing frequency and preferences for lactating cow therapy by Ontario dairy veterinarians.

Leger D, Newby N, Reid-Smith R, Anderson N, Pearl D, Lissemore K Can Vet J. 2017; 58(1):26-34.

PMID: 28042151 PMC: 5157734.


References
1.
Schukken Y, Grommers F, Smit J, Vandegeer D, Brand A . Effect of freezing on bacteriologic culturing of mastitis milk samples. J Dairy Sci. 1989; 72(7):1900-6. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79309-7. View

2.
Schukken Y, Grommers F, van de Geer D, Brand A . Incidence of clinical mastitis on farms with low somatic cell counts in bulk milk. Vet Rec. 1989; 125(3):60-3. DOI: 10.1136/vr.125.3.60. View

3.
PEARSON J, Mackie D . Factors associated with the occurrence, cause and outcome of clinical mastitis in dairy cattle. Vet Rec. 1979; 105(20):456-63. DOI: 10.1136/vr.105.20.456. View

4.
Erb H, Martin S . Interrelationships between production and reproductive diseases in Holstein cows. Data. J Dairy Sci. 1980; 63(11):1911-7. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)83158-4. View

5.
Daniel R, OBoyle D, Marek M, Frost A . A survey of clinical mastitis in South-East Queensland dairy herds. Aust Vet J. 1982; 58(4):143-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1982.tb00625.x. View