[Three-dimensional Thickness and Volume Measurements of the Knee Joint Cartilage Using MRI: Validation in an Anatomical Specimen by CT Arthrography]
Overview
Radiology
Affiliations
Purpose: In the present study we intended to validate knee joint cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MRI.
Methods: Ten fresh cadaver knees (age 29 to 64 yrs.) were sagittally imaged, using a fat-suppressed FLASH-3D sequence with a resolution of 2 x 0.31 x 0.31 mm3. Then, a contrast agent was injected and the specimens submitted to CT arthrography. From both modalities the patellar, femoral, and tibial cartilages were segmented semiautomatically and reconstructed three-dimensionally. The cartilage thickness was determined independently of the sectional plane, based on a "minimal distance algorithm".
Results: The volumes and the regional distribution patterns yielded a very high degree of similarity on direct comparison of both imaging modalities. The average volume error between MRI and CT was 3.8% (+/- 3.0%), the correlation 0.998, the slope of the regression line 1.04 and the gamma-intercept -80 mm3. The analysis yielded no significant differences between the two methods (Wilcoxon signed rank test, 5% level) in the patella, femur, medial, and lateral tibia.
Conclusion: The results suggest that, based on a fat-suppressed FLASH sequence with high resolution and three-dimensional concepts of digital image analysis, the cartilage volume and thickness can be analysed non-invasively and with high accuracy by MRI.
Wirth W, Ladel C, Maschek S, Wisser A, Eckstein F, Roemer F Skeletal Radiol. 2022; 52(11):2107-2122.
PMID: 36380243 PMC: 10509082. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04228-w.
Saxena R, Friedman S, Bly R, Otjen J, Alessio A, Li Y JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019; 21(3):237-243.
PMID: 30730533 PMC: 6537836. DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1931.
Garcia-Sanz V, Bellot-Arcis C, Hernandez V, Serrano-Sanchez P, Guarinos J, Paredes-Gallardo V Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):11993.
PMID: 28931867 PMC: 5607232. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12100-4.
Saito S, Murase K Radiol Phys Technol. 2012; 6(1):7-13.
PMID: 22729620 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-012-0163-4.
Saito S, Murase K Br J Radiol. 2012; 85(1019):e973-8.
PMID: 22674712 PMC: 3500820. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/13040401.