» Articles » PMID: 9432970

Assessment of Water Use for Estimating Exposure to Tap Water Contaminants

Overview
Date 1998 Feb 12
PMID 9432970
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Epidemiological studies examining the association between exposure to tap water contaminants (such as chlorination by-products) and disease outcomes (such as cancer and adverse reproductive outcomes) have been limited by inaccurate exposure assessment. Failure to take into account the variation in beverage and tap water consumption and exposure to volatile contaminants through inhalation and dermal absorption can introduce misclassification in assessing the association between exposure to tap water contaminants and health. To refine exposure assessment of tap water contaminants, we describe in detail the tap water consumption, showering, and bathing habits of pregnant women and their male partners as assessed by a questionnaire and a 3-day water diary. We found good agreement between questionnaire and 3-day water diary values for drinking water intake (Pearson's r = 0.78) and for time spent showering(r = 0.68) and bathing (r = 0.78). Half of the participants consumed tap water on a regular basis with an overall mean +/- 1 standard deviation (SD) of 0. 78 +/- 0.51 l/day. Our results further suggest that full-time employees, compared to women working part-time or less, have more heterogeneous consumption patterns over time. Seventy-nine percent of women and 94% of men took showers for an average of 11.6 +/-4.0 min and 10.4 +/- 4.8 min, respectively. Baths were taken more frequently by women than men (21% vs. 3%) for an average of 22.9 +/-10.1 min and 21.3 +/- 12.4 min, respectively. Thus, these patterns of tap water use should be considered in the design and interpretation of environmental epidemiology studies.

Citing Articles

Is maternal employment site a source of exposure misclassification in studies of environmental exposures and birth outcomes? A simulation-based bias analysis of haloacetic acids in tap water and hypospadias.

Zaganjor I, Keil A, Luben T, Desrosiers T, Engel L, Reefhuis J Environ Epidemiol. 2022; 6(2):e207.

PMID: 35434460 PMC: 9005252. DOI: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000207.


Maternal arsenic exposure and nonsyndromic orofacial clefts.

Suhl J, Leonard S, Weyer P, Rhoads A, Siega-Riz A, Anthony T Birth Defects Res. 2018; 110(19):1455-1467.

PMID: 30367712 PMC: 6885005. DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1386.


Associations between Maternal Water Consumption and Birth Defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (2000-2005).

Alman B, Coffman E, Siega-Riz A, Luben T Birth Defects Res. 2016; 109(3):193-202.

PMID: 27768247 PMC: 6193258. DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23569.


Variability and epistemic uncertainty in water ingestion rates and pharmacokinetic parameters, and impact on the association between perfluorooctanoate and preeclampsia in the C8 Health Project population.

Avanasi R, Shin H, Vieira V, Bartell S Environ Res. 2016; 146:299-307.

PMID: 26796985 PMC: 4761513. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.01.011.


Estimating drinking-water ingestion and dermal contact with water in a French population of pregnant women: the EDDS cohort study.

Albouy-Llaty M, Dupuis A, Grignon C, Strezlec S, Pierre F, Rabouan S J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2014; 25(3):308-16.

PMID: 25073435 DOI: 10.1038/jes.2014.48.


References
1.
Sharrett A, Carter A, Orheim R, Feinleib M . Daily intake of lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc from drinking water: The Seattle Study of Trace Metal Exposure. Environ Res. 1982; 28(2):456-75. DOI: 10.1016/0013-9351(82)90142-6. View

2.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

3.
Hertz-Picciotto I, Swan S, Neutra R, Samuels S . Spontaneous abortions in relation to consumption of tap water: an application of methods from survival analysis to a pregnancy follow-up study. Am J Epidemiol. 1989; 130(1):79-93. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115325. View

4.
Lynch C, Woolson R, OGorman T, Cantor K . Chlorinated drinking water and bladder cancer: effect of misclassification on risk estimates. Arch Environ Health. 1989; 44(4):252-9. DOI: 10.1080/00039896.1989.9935891. View

5.
Ershow A, Brown L, Cantor K . Intake of tapwater and total water by pregnant and lactating women. Am J Public Health. 1991; 81(3):328-34. PMC: 1405003. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.81.3.328. View