» Articles » PMID: 9431423

The Medical Specialist: Information Gateway or Gatekeeper for the Family Practitioner

Overview
Date 1998 Feb 12
PMID 9431423
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The medical specialist emerged as a critical gatekeeper in a study of information sources used by family practitioners in New Zealand. Thirty-four practitioners in the Wellington region were interviewed and their responses examined to ascertain the extent to which five criteria influenced their choice of information sources for clinical decision-making. The criteria were availability, searchability, understandability, credibility, and applicability. Of three major information sources investigated (textbooks, colleagues, and medical specialists), textbooks were consulted most frequently but were rated less valuable than colleagues and specialists as a source of information. The medical specialist was identified as the information source that best meets the five criteria. Thus, specialists play an important role in disseminating information to family practitioners. However, female practitioners included in the study were less likely to approach specialists than were their male counterparts. Physicians made little use of medical libraries to support clinical decision-making. The apparent disadvantage of female practitioners in accessing specialists needs to be addressed by professional associations. Medical librarians seeking to improve the access of family practitioners to recent literature should consider the heavy use made of specialists as a source of information.

Citing Articles

A social network analysis on clinical education of diabetic foot.

Shokoohi M, Nedjat S, Majdzadeh R J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2013; 12(1):44.

PMID: 24330538 PMC: 3879216. DOI: 10.1186/2251-6581-12-44.


A social network analysis of treatment discoveries in cancer.

Tsalatsanis A, Barnes L, Hozo I, Skvoretz J, Djulbegovic B PLoS One. 2011; 6(3):e18060.

PMID: 21464896 PMC: 3065482. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018060.


Developing informatics tools and strategies for consumer-centered health communication.

Keselman A, Logan R, Smith C, Leroy G, Zeng-Treitler Q J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008; 15(4):473-83.

PMID: 18436895 PMC: 2442255. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2744.


Factors affecting influential discussions among physicians: a social network analysis of a primary care practice.

Keating N, Ayanian J, Cleary P, Marsden P J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22(6):794-8.

PMID: 17404798 PMC: 2219865. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0190-8.


The information sources and journals consulted or read by UK paediatricians to inform their clinical practice and those which they consider important: a questionnaire survey.

Jones T, Hanney S, Buxton M BMC Pediatr. 2007; 7:1.

PMID: 17224061 PMC: 1783849. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-7-1.


References
1.
Geyman J . Family practice and the gatekeeper role. J Fam Pract. 1983; 17(4):587-8. View

2.
Gruppen L, Wolf F, Van Voorhees C, Stross J . Information-seeking strategies and differences among primary care physicians. Mobius. 1986; 7(3):18-26. DOI: 10.1002/chp.4760070306. View

3.
Glasgow N . The gatekeeper controversy: why it exists and how it can be resolved. N Z Med J. 1996; 109(1021):168-70. View

4.
Verhoeven A, Boerma E, Jong B . Use of information sources by family physicians: a literature survey. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995; 83(1):85-90. PMC: 226003. View

5.
Connelly D, Rich E, Curley S, Kelly J . Knowledge resource preferences of family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1990; 30(3):353-9. View