» Articles » PMID: 9420281

A Similar Pattern of Interaction for Different Antibodies with a Major Antigenic Site of Foot-and-mouth Disease Virus: Implications for Intratypic Antigenic Variation

Overview
Journal J Virol
Date 1998 Jan 7
PMID 9420281
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The three-dimensional structures of the Fab fragment of a neutralizing antibody raised against a foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) of serotype C1, alone and complexed to an antigenic peptide representing the major antigenic site A (G-H loop of VP1), have been determined. As previously seen in a complex of the same antigen with another antibody which recognizes a different epitope within antigenic site A, the receptor recognition motif Arg-Gly-Asp and some residues from an adjacent helix participate directly in the interaction with the complementarity-determining regions of the antibody. Remarkably, the structures of the two antibodies become more similar upon binding the peptide, and both undergo considerable induced fit to accommodate the peptide with a similar array of interactions. Furthermore, the pattern of reactivities of five additional antibodies with versions of the antigenic peptide bearing amino acid replacements suggests a similar pattern of interaction of antibodies raised against widely different antigens of serotype C. The results reinforce the occurrence of a defined antigenic structure at this mobile, exposed antigenic site and imply that intratypic antigenic variation of FMDV of serotype C is due to subtle structural differences that affect antibody recognition while preserving a functional structure for the receptor binding site.

Citing Articles

Functional and Characterization of Neutralizing Interactions Between Antibodies and the Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Immunodominant Antigenic Site.

Marrero Diaz de Villegas R, Seki C, Mattion N, Konig G Front Vet Sci. 2021; 8:554383.

PMID: 34026880 PMC: 8137985. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.554383.


In vitro evolution and affinity-maturation with Coliphage qβ display.

Skamel C, Aller S, Waffo A PLoS One. 2014; 9(11):e113069.

PMID: 25393763 PMC: 4231119. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113069.


Determining the epitope dominance on the capsid of a serotype SAT2 foot-and-mouth disease virus by mutational analyses.

Opperman P, Rotherham L, Esterhuysen J, Charleston B, Juleff N, Capozzo A J Virol. 2014; 88(15):8307-18.

PMID: 24829347 PMC: 4135947. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00470-14.


Genetic heterogeneity in the leader and P1-coding regions of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotypes A and O in Africa.

Chitray M, de Beer T, Vosloo W, Maree F Arch Virol. 2013; 159(5):947-61.

PMID: 24221247 PMC: 4010724. DOI: 10.1007/s00705-013-1838-9.


Viral quasispecies evolution.

Domingo E, Sheldon J, Perales C Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012; 76(2):159-216.

PMID: 22688811 PMC: 3372249. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.05023-11.


References
1.
Jones T . Diffraction methods for biological macromolecules. Interactive computer graphics: FRODO. Methods Enzymol. 1985; 115:157-71. DOI: 10.1016/0076-6879(85)15014-7. View

2.
Lea S, ABU-GHAZALEH R, Blakemore W, Curry S, Fry E, Jackson T . Structural comparison of two strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus subtype O1 and a laboratory antigenic variant, G67. Structure. 1995; 3(6):571-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00191-5. View

3.
Nicholls A, Sharp K, Honig B . Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins. 1991; 11(4):281-96. DOI: 10.1002/prot.340110407. View

4.
Smith T, Chase E, Schmidt T, Olson N, Baker T . Neutralizing antibody to human rhinovirus 14 penetrates the receptor-binding canyon. Nature. 1996; 383(6598):350-4. PMC: 4167671. DOI: 10.1038/383350a0. View

5.
Domingo E, Mateu M, Escarmis C, Martinez-Salas E, Andreu D, Giralt E . Molecular evolution of aphthoviruses. Virus Genes. 1995; 11(2-3):197-207. DOI: 10.1007/BF01728659. View