» Articles » PMID: 9419072

The Functional Effectiveness of Neck Muscle Reflexes for Head-righting in Response to Sudden Fall

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 1998 Jan 7
PMID 9419072
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reflex head-righting in normal and labyrinthine-defective (LD) subjects was compared to identify the relative functional effectiveness of vestibular-collic and cervico-collic myotactic reflexes. To restrict stimuli largely to the head and neck, subjects lay supine, supported up to the shoulders on a horizontal bed with their head supported in a sling over the edge. The head fell freely as the sling was released with an electromagnetic catch. Head drops were delivered with the subjects instructed to relax and accept the fall passively or to actively right the head as fast as possible. With both instructions, righting responses in normal subjects commenced with electromyographic (EMG) bursts in the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) at 24.5 ms latency, which was reflected in a deceleration of the downwards head velocity. The latency of the earliest EMG responses in LD subjects was 67.4 ms, accompanied by similar deceleration. It is assumed that the earliest response in normal subjects is vestibular, whereas in LDs the SCM stretch reflex is the earliest response. These reflexes are followed at circa 100 ms by more intense EMG activity due to voluntary movement, but braking of head fall is evident before voluntary activity takes effect. Righting was more effective in normal subjects than in LDs, and when "active" normal subjects made more vigorous righting responses than when "passive"; whereas active righting in LDs was no better than passive. The results demonstrate that reflex responses contribute significantly to head-righting. The vestibular contribution gives an advantage over stretch reflexes alone and also assists in voluntary enhancement of reflex responses.

Citing Articles

Evaluating a 14-week neck strengthening protocol for neuromuscular indicators associated with head and neck trauma.

Schroeder L, Tyndall M, McDaniel A, Wang Y, Kale J Sports Med Health Sci. 2024; 7(1):61-67.

PMID: 39649794 PMC: 11624327. DOI: 10.1016/j.smhs.2024.04.002.


Using Neck Muscle Afferentation to Control an Ongoing Limb Movement? Individual Differences in the Influence of Brief Neck Vibration.

Alekhina M, Perkic G, Manson G, Blouin J, Tremblay L Brain Sci. 2023; 13(10).

PMID: 37891776 PMC: 10605713. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13101407.


'Falling heads': investigating reflexive responses to head-neck perturbations.

Wochner I, Nolle L, Martynenko O, Schmitt S Biomed Eng Online. 2022; 21(1):25.

PMID: 35429975 PMC: 9013062. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-022-00994-9.


The Role of Neck Musculature in Traumatic Brain Injuries in Older Adults: Implications From Sports Medicine.

Wood T, Morrison S, Sosnoff J Front Med (Lausanne). 2019; 6:53.

PMID: 31001532 PMC: 6455050. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00053.


Assessing Head/Neck Dynamic Response to Head Perturbation: A Systematic Review.

Le Flao E, Brughelli M, Hume P, King D Sports Med. 2018; 48(11):2641-2658.

PMID: 30242627 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-018-0984-3.