» Articles » PMID: 9408429

Medically Unnecessary Pediatric Ambulance Transports: a Medical Taxi Service?

Overview
Journal Acad Emerg Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 1997 Dec 31
PMID 9408429
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To characterize ambulance utilization in a pediatric population and pediatric emergency physicians' judgement of the medical need for ambulance transport.

Methods: A convenience sample of ambulance transports were studied prospectively during a 5-week period. Exclusion criteria included transfer from another medical facility, study physician not available, need for immediate resuscitation, or trauma team activation. A questionnaire completed by the physician assessed medical need for the ambulance based on chief complaint, general appearance, vital signs, and ambulance run sheet information. A separate questionnaire was administered to the parents regarding reasons for ambulance use and other available means of transportation. Caregivers were contacted by telephone 2-3 days later to determine the mode of transportation home and the clinical outcome.

Results: Of 172 eligible patients, 92 (53%) were enrolled. Most (61%; 56/92) transports were considered medically unnecessary. Interestingly, 40% (37/92) of the subjects had no other means of transportation; 86% (32/37) of ambulance transports for this group were judged medically unnecessary. Overall, 86% (79/92) of families had not called their physician. There was no association between having spoken with the physician and medical need for an ambulance. Many (82%; 46/56) Medicaid transports were judged medically unnecessary Overall, follow-up was achieved for 91% (85/92) of the patients. No patient for whom transport was medically unnecessary had a repeat ED visit for the same complaint or required admission. Most patients (74%; 68/92) returned home without any assistance. Among the medically unnecessary transports, 52% (32/60) of the caregivers cited no other means of transportation, yet 34% (11/32) of these patients returned home by private car.

Conclusions: Most pediatric ambulance transports in this sample, which excluded patients requiring immediate resuscitation or trauma team care, were judged to be medically unnecessary. Caregivers often use an ambulance as a convenience or as the only means of transportation. An alternate, less resource-intensive transportation system may be more appropriate for this population.

Citing Articles

Prevalence of Low-Acuity Pediatric Emergency Medical Services Transports to a Pediatric Emergency Department in an Urban Area.

Ward C, Badolato G, Taylor M, Brown K, Simpson J, Chamberlain J Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024; 40(5):347-352.

PMID: 38355133 PMC: 11096070. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003131.


Effects of Closure of the Paediatric Department of a District Hospital on Regional Care: Analysis of Patient Flows.

Tischler L, Beyer A, Moon K, Hoffmann W, Berg N Gesundheitswesen. 2023; 85(S 03):S205-S211.

PMID: 37751757 PMC: 10662054. DOI: 10.1055/a-2130-2479.


Emergency medical services utilisation among febrile children attending emergency departments across Europe: an observational multicentre study.

Tan C, Vermont C, Zachariasse J, von Both U, Eleftheriou I, Emonts M Eur J Pediatr. 2023; 182(9):3939-3947.

PMID: 37354239 PMC: 10570223. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-05056-3.


Is 911 The Answer? A Retrospective Review of Emergency Medical Services Use by Home Care Providers.

McKay S, Mohammed E, Roy M, Hung V, Wong M, Lum B Health Serv Insights. 2023; 16:11786329231178767.

PMID: 37275948 PMC: 10233601. DOI: 10.1177/11786329231178767.


Clinician and Caregiver Determinations of Acuity for Children Transported by Emergency Medical Services: A Prospective Observational Study.

Ward C, Badolato G, Taylor M, Brown K, Simpson J, Chamberlain J Ann Emerg Med. 2022; 81(3):343-352.

PMID: 36334958 PMC: 9974545. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.09.002.