» Articles » PMID: 9400909

Autonomic Nervous System Activity in Essential Hypertension: a Comparison Between Dippers and Non-dippers

Overview
Journal J Hum Hypertens
Date 1997 Dec 24
PMID 9400909
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study was undertaken to investigate the changes in autonomic nervous system activity in essential hypertension. Fourteen normotensive controls and 33 age-matched untreated hypertensive subjects, diagnosed by ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) measurement (24-h systolic ABP value over 140 mm Hg or 24-h diastolic ABP over 90 mm Hg, or both) were recruited. ABP and 24-h electrocardiogram were monitored simultaneously. Power spectral analysis of the R-R interval was performed by a fast Fourier transformation method and the powers of low frequency (LF; 0.04 to 0.15 Hz) and high frequency (HF; 0.15 to 0.4 Hz) components were obtained. Hypertensive subjects were divided into 'dippers', whose night-time systolic ABP fell by more than 10% of their daytime ABP, and 'non-dippers' in whom this phenomenon was absent. In hypertensive subjects, electrocardiogram monitoring and power spectral analysis were also performed for 5 min before and during 90 degrees tilt. There were no significant differences in the 24-h mean LF/HF power ratio, LF power or HF power between normotensive and hypertensive subjects. A significant negative correlation between the night-time systolic ABP level and the 24-h LF/HF power ratio was found (r= -0.36, P < 0.05) in the hypertensive subjects. A significant positive correlation was found between the 24-h LF/HF power ratio and the percentage nocturnal reduction of the daytime systolic ABP in hypertensive subjects (r = +0.40, P < 0.01). The 24-h LF/HF power ratio was significantly lower in non-dippers than in dippers (2.09 +/- 1.06 vs 3.24 +/- 0.97, P < 0.01). The mean daytime LF/HF power ratio was significantly lower in non-dippers than in dippers (2.50 +/- 1.43 vs 4.08 +/- 1.27, P < 0.01). The night-time LF/HF power ratio was not significantly different between the two groups. The LF/HF power ratio increased significantly in dippers (from 1.32 +/- 1.95 to 4.65 +/- 1.54, P < 0.001) during 90 degrees tilt, but there was no significant change in the LF/HF power ratio in non-dippers during tilt (from 1.13 +/- 0.28 to 1.36 +/- 0.78, NS). The 24-h LF/HF power ratio decreased according as the night-time systolic BP elevated in hypertensive subjects. During ambulatory monitoring, the non-dippers showed a significantly lower LF/HF power ratio than the dippers. The LF/HF power ratio increased significantly in dippers, but not in non-dippers during tilting. These results suggest that impaired cardiovascular reflexes might contribute to the decreased sympathovagal balance in non-dipper type hypertension.

Citing Articles

Effects of continuous supplementation of Harms on the cardiac autonomic function of community-dwelling elderly individuals during resting and standing tests: a randomized controlled trial.

Sato T, Aoki T, Ito Y, Oishi K, Fujishima M, Okumura E Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1336676.

PMID: 38525193 PMC: 10957529. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1336676.


Non-Dipping Blood Pressure or Nocturnal Hypertension: Does One Matter More?.

Tang A, Yang E, Ebinger J Curr Hypertens Rep. 2023; 26(1):21-30.

PMID: 37955827 PMC: 10796526. DOI: 10.1007/s11906-023-01273-1.


Effect of baroreflex activation therapy on dipping pattern in patients with resistant hypertension.

Wallbach M, Born E, Schafer A, Koziolek M J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022; 25(1):22-29.

PMID: 36545753 PMC: 9832236. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14620.


The Effect of Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction on the Progression of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Liu B, Zhao Y, Zhang H Int J Gen Med. 2022; 15:4565-4573.

PMID: 35528285 PMC: 9075998. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S362275.


Circadian Rhythm of Blood Pressure of Dipper and Non-dipper Patients With Essential Hypertension: A Mathematical Modeling Approach.

Cortes-Rios J, Rodriguez-Fernandez M Front Physiol. 2021; 11:536146.

PMID: 33536928 PMC: 7848196. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.536146.