» Articles » PMID: 9399168

Receiver Operating Characteristic Study of Image Preprocessing for Teleradiology and Digital Workstations

Overview
Journal J Digit Imaging
Publisher Springer
Date 1997 Dec 17
PMID 9399168
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether digitized analog images displayed on a digital workstation can be improved by using a preprocessing algorithm, and if so, whether the quality of the resulting images can reach that of the original films. The material contained 120 difficult cases (about 50% with selected pathology). Four radiologists each evaluated half of the randomly ordered cases with the digital workstation and half of the cases with the original radiographs. The data were compared with a previous similar study, where the workstation had no option for preprocessed images. Preprocessed digital images were clearly superior to digital images without preprocessing, although for those of the highest diagnostic difficulty they were inferior to the original films. The preprocessing algorithm has improved the diagnostic quality of the digital workstation. There is room yet for improvement compared to plain films, although the current setup may be sufficient in some settings.

Citing Articles

Why and how is soft copy reading possible in clinical practice?.

Mertelmeier T J Digit Imaging. 1999; 12(1):3-11.

PMID: 10036662 PMC: 3452431. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168621.

References
1.
Stormer J, Bolle S, Sund T, Weller G, GITLIN J . ROC-study of a teleradiology workstation versus film readings. Acta Radiol. 1997; 38(1):176-80. DOI: 10.1080/02841859709171264. View

2.
Curtis D, GAYLER B, GITLIN J, Harrington M . Teleradiology: results of a field trial. Radiology. 1983; 149(2):415-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.149.2.6622684. View

3.
Scott Jr W, Rosenbaum J, Ackerman S, Reichle R, Magid D, Weller J . Subtle orthopedic fractures: teleradiology workstation versus film interpretation. Radiology. 1993; 187(3):811-5. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.187.3.8497636. View

4.
Scott Jr W, Bluemke D, Mysko W, Weller G, Kelen G, Reichle R . Interpretation of emergency department radiographs by radiologists and emergency medicine physicians: teleradiology workstation versus radiograph readings. Radiology. 1995; 195(1):223-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.195.1.7892474. View

5.
Slovis T . The clinical usefulness of teleradiology of neonates: expanded services without expanded staff. Pediatr Radiol. 1991; 21(5):333-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02011480. View