» Articles » PMID: 9385303

Does the Computerized Display of Charges Affect Inpatient Ancillary Test Utilization?

Overview
Journal Arch Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1997 Dec 31
PMID 9385303
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The computerized display of charges for ancillary tests in outpatients has been found to affect physician-ordering behavior, but this issue has not been studied in inpatients.

Objective: To assess whether the computerized display of charges for clinical laboratory or radiological tests affected physician-ordering behavior.

Patients And Methods: Two prospective controlled trials, randomized by patient, were performed. Each trial included all medical and surgical inpatients at 1 large teaching hospital during 4 and 7 months: 3536 intervention and 3554 control inpatients in the group with clinical laboratory tests, and 8728 intervention and 8653 control inpatients in the group with radiological tests. The intervention consisted of the computerized display of charges for tests at the time of ordering.

Main Outcome Measures: The number of clinical laboratory and radiological tests ordered per admission and the charges for these tests.

Results: For the clinical laboratory tests, during a 4-month study period, patients in the intervention group had 4.5% fewer tests ordered, and the total charges for these tests were 4.2% lower, although neither difference was statistically significant. Compared with historical controls from the same 4-month period a year before, the charges for the tests per admission had decreased 13.3%, but the decrease was temporally correlated with a restriction of future ordering of tests, and not with the introduction of the display of charges. For the radiological tests, during a 7-month period, the intervention group had almost identical numbers of tests ordered and charges for these tests.

Conclusions: The computerized display of charges had no statistically significant effect on the number of clinical laboratory tests or radiological procedures ordered or performed, although small trends were present for clinical laboratory tests. More intensive interventions may be needed to affect physician test utilization.

Citing Articles

Reporting of costs and economic impacts in randomized trials of de-implementation interventions for low-value care: a systematic scoping review.

Falkenbach P, Raudasoja A, Vernooij R, Mustonen J, Agarwal A, Aoki Y Implement Sci. 2023; 18(1):36.

PMID: 37605243 PMC: 10440866. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01290-3.


Displaying Cost and Completion Time for Reference Laboratory Test Orders-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ikoma S, Pierce L, Bell D, Cheng E, Drake T, Guo R Appl Clin Inform. 2022; 13(3):656-664.

PMID: 35580621 PMC: 9259202. DOI: 10.1055/a-1854-4253.


Effect of a price display intervention on laboratory test ordering behavior of general practitioners.

Muris D, Molenaers M, Nguyen T, Bergmans P, van Acker B, Krekels M BMC Fam Pract. 2021; 22(1):242.

PMID: 34861828 PMC: 8639847. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01591-w.


A quality improvement project to reduce overutilization of blood tests in a teaching hospital.

Almeqdadi M, Krishnan Nair H, Hill J, Sanchez-Cruz J, Nader C, Jaber B J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2019; 9(3):189-194.

PMID: 31258856 PMC: 6586109. DOI: 10.1080/20009666.2019.1601979.


The Effectiveness of Cost Reduction with Charge Displays on Test Ordering under the Health Insurance System in Japan: A Study Using Paper-based Simulated Cases for Residents and Clinical Fellows.

Hirota Y, Suzuki S, Ohira Y, Shikino K, Ikusaka M Intern Med. 2018; 58(2):187-193.

PMID: 30210103 PMC: 6378163. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0738-17.