» Articles » PMID: 9378400

Detection of Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Cirrhotic Livers Using Iodised Oil Computed Tomography

Overview
Journal Gut
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1998 Feb 12
PMID 9378400
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The detection of hepatocellular cancers (HCC) is a major role of preoperative imaging in patients with end stage liver disease being considered for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

Aims: To assess the sensitivity of iodised oil computed tomography (IOCT).

Patients And Methods: A prospective evaluation in 50 consecutive patients undergoing OLT included ultrasound scan, contrast enhanced CT, angiography (with intra-arterial injection of iodised oil), and a second CT (IOCT) 10 days later. Following transplantation the explant liver was serially sectioned for pathological evaluation. Soft tissue radiographs of the liver slices were used to match histological lesions with CT findings.

Results: Eleven patients were excluded due to protocol violations. Of the remaining 39, histological evaluation revealed no cancers in 33 explant livers, in keeping with negative preoperative imaging. Six explant livers contained 55 HCCs, 84% of which were less than 1 cm in diameter. Pretransplant IOCT detected 3/6 patients with cancer (50%) but only 7% of cancerous lesions. Ultrasound, contrast CT, and angiography each detected 2/6 patients with cancer and 4% of cancerous lesions.

Conclusion: IOCT is an insensitive method for the detection of small HCCs in livers with advanced cirrhosis but in this study was slightly superior to ultrasound, CT, and angiography.

Citing Articles

Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Nadarevic T, Giljaca V, Colli A, Fraquelli M, Casazza G, Miletic D Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 10:CD013362.

PMID: 34611889 PMC: 8493329. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013362.pub2.


Comparison of unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in detecting very small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Tarao K, Nozaki A, Komatsu H, Komatsu T, Taguri M, Tanaka K World J Hepatol. 2021; 13(6):699-708.

PMID: 34239704 PMC: 8239491. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i6.699.


Abdominal ultrasound and alpha-foetoprotein for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Colli A, Nadarevic T, Miletic D, Giljaca V, Fraquelli M, Stimac D Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 4:CD013346.

PMID: 33855699 PMC: 8078581. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013346.pub2.


Real impact of tumor marker AFP and PIVKA-II in detecting very small hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 2 cm, Barcelona stage 0) - assessment with large number of cases.

Tarao K, Nozaki A, Komatsu H, Komatsu T, Taguri M, Tanaka K World J Hepatol. 2020; 12(11):1046-1054.

PMID: 33312428 PMC: 7701964. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i11.1046.


A diagnostic paradigm for resectable liver lesions: to biopsy or not to biopsy?.

Cresswell A, Welsh F, Rees M HPB (Oxford). 2010; 11(7):533-40.

PMID: 20495704 PMC: 2785947. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00081.x.


References
1.
Okuda K, Peters R, SIMSON I . Gross anatomic features of hepatocellular carcinoma from three disparate geographic areas. Proposal of new classification. Cancer. 1984; 54(10):2165-73. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19841115)54:10<2165::aid-cncr2820541017>3.0.co;2-7. View

2.
Demetris A, Jaffe R, Starzl T . A review of adult and pediatric post-transplant liver pathology. Pathol Annu. 1987; 22 Pt 2:347-86. View

3.
Yoshimatsu S, Inoue Y, Ibukuro K, Suzuki S . Hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma undetected at angiography and CT with iodized oil. Radiology. 1989; 171(2):343-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.171.2.2539607. View

4.
Choi B, Park J, Kim B, Kim S, Han M, Kim C . Small hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with sonography, computed tomography (CT), angiography and Lipiodol-CT. Br J Radiol. 1989; 62(742):897-903. DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-62-742-897. View

5.
Takayasu K, Moriyama N, Muramatsu Y, Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Okazaki N . The diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinomas: efficacy of various imaging procedures in 100 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990; 155(1):49-54. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.155.1.1693808. View