» Articles » PMID: 9357340

The Invisibility of Public Health: Population-level Measures in a Politics of Market Individualism

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 1997 Nov 14
PMID 9357340
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper models the prevailing political attack on government as a heuristic, a judgmental strategy that simplifies complex phenomena by applying simple tests to a limited set of relevant data. The heuristic of market individualism offers three tools for analyzing the problems of governing: the supremacy of the free market as a regulatory device, a belief in individual freedom of choice and personal responsibility, and the elevation of individual satisfaction as the chief goal of society. Because public health is inherently concerned with the health of the population rather than individual health, because the market itself is a major source of ill health, and because individual choice is socially mediated, use of the heuristic precludes the recognition of the value of public health work. Although some degree of accommodation to current political realities is a practical necessity, public health advocates must not neglect the task of fashioning radically different alternative visions over the long term.

Citing Articles

A Transdisciplinary Approach to Public Health Law: The Emerging Practice of Legal Epidemiology.

Burris S, Ashe M, Levin D, Penn M, Larkin M Annu Rev Public Health. 2015; 37:135-48.

PMID: 26667606 PMC: 5703193. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021841.


From health as a rational choice to health as an affordable choice.

Maziak W, Ward K Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(12):2134-9.

PMID: 19833991 PMC: 2775783. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.155382.


Extended antipaternalism.

Hansson S J Med Ethics. 2005; 31(2):97-100.

PMID: 15681674 PMC: 1734090. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.005488.


Public health law reform.

Gostin L Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(9):1365-8.

PMID: 11527757 PMC: 1446780. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.9.1365.


The privatization of risk.

Rockhill B Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(3):365-8.

PMID: 11236399 PMC: 1446576. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.3.365.


References
1.
Rose G . Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol. 1985; 14(1):32-8. DOI: 10.1093/ije/14.1.32. View

2.
Fox D . The history of responses to epidemic disease in the United States since the 18th century. Mt Sinai J Med. 1989; 56(3):223-9. View

3.
Jeffery R . Risk behaviors and health. Contrasting individual and population perspectives. Am Psychol. 1989; 44(9):1194-202. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.44.9.1194. View

4.
Egolf B, Lasker J, Wolf S, Potvin L . The Roseto effect: a 50-year comparison of mortality rates. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82(8):1089-92. PMC: 1695733. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.82.8.1089. View

5.
LaVeist T . Segregation, poverty, and empowerment: health consequences for African Americans. Milbank Q. 1993; 71(1):41-64. View