» Articles » PMID: 9335618

Evolutionary Dynamics of Sporophytic Self-incompatibility Alleles in Plants

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 1997 Oct 23
PMID 9335618
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The stationary frequency distribution and allelic dynamics in finite populations are analyzed through stochastic simulations in three models of single-locus, multi-allelic sporophytic self-incompatibility. The models differ in the dominance relationships among alleles. In one model, alleles act codominantly in both pollen and style (SSIcod), in the second, alleles form a dominance hierarchy in pollen and style (SSIdom). In the third model, alleles interact codominantly in the style and form a dominance hierarchy in the pollen (SSIdomcod). The SSIcod model behaves similarly to the model of gametophytic self-incompatibility, but the selection intensity is stronger. With dominance, dominant alleles invade the population more easily than recessive alleles and have a lower frequency at equilibrium. In the SSIdom model, recessive alleles have both a higher allele frequency and higher expected life span. In the SSIdomcod model, however, loss due to drift occurs more easily for pollen-recessive than for pollen-dominant alleles, and therefore, dominant alleles have a higher expected life span than the more recessive alleles. The process of allelic turnover in the SSIdomcod and SSIdom models is closely approximated by a random walk on a dominance ladder. Implications of the results for experimental studies of sporophytic self-incompatibility in natural populations are discussed.

Citing Articles

Transition to Self-compatibility Associated With Dominant S-allele in a Diploid Siberian Progenitor of Allotetraploid Arabidopsis kamchatica Revealed by Arabidopsis lyrata Genomes.

Kolesnikova U, Scott A, Van de Velde J, Burns R, Tikhomirov N, Pfordt U Mol Biol Evol. 2023; 40(7).

PMID: 37432770 PMC: 10335350. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msad122.


Ancestral self-compatibility facilitates the establishment of allopolyploids in Brassicaceae.

Novikova P, Kolesnikova U, Scott A Plant Reprod. 2022; 36(1):125-138.

PMID: 36282331 PMC: 9957919. DOI: 10.1007/s00497-022-00451-6.


Evolution of self-incompatibility in the Brassicaceae: Lessons from a textbook example of natural selection.

Durand E, Chantreau M, Le Veve A, Stetsenko R, Dubin M, Genete M Evol Appl. 2020; 13(6):1279-1297.

PMID: 32684959 PMC: 7359833. DOI: 10.1111/eva.12933.


The opposing effects of genetic drift and Haldane's sieve on floral-morph frequencies in tristylous metapopulations.

Roux C, Pannell J New Phytol. 2019; 224(3):1229-1240.

PMID: 31505031 PMC: 6856859. DOI: 10.1111/nph.16187.


The impact of self-incompatibility systems on the prevention of biparental inbreeding.

Furstenau T, Cartwright R PeerJ. 2017; 5:e4085.

PMID: 29188143 PMC: 5703146. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4085.


References
1.
Atwood S . Oppositional Alleles Causing Cross-Incompatibility in Trifolium Repens. Genetics. 1942; 27(3):333-8. PMC: 1209162. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/27.3.333. View

2.
Emerson S . A Preliminary Survey of the Oenothera Organensis Population. Genetics. 1939; 24(4):524-37. PMC: 1209051. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/24.4.524. View

3.
Richman A, Kao T, Schaeffer S, Uyenoyama M . S-allele sequence diversity in natural populations of Solanum carolinense (Horsenettle). Heredity (Edinb). 1995; 75 ( Pt 4):405-15. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1995.153. View

4.
Sampson D . Frequency and Distribution of Self-Incompatibility Alleles in RAPHANUS RAPHANISTRUM. Genetics. 1967; 56(2):241-51. PMC: 1211500. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/56.2.241. View

5.
Boyes D, Nasrallah M, Vrebalov J, Nasrallah J . The self-incompatibility (S) haplotypes of Brassica contain highly divergent and rearranged sequences of ancient origin. Plant Cell. 1997; 9(2):237-47. PMC: 156914. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.9.2.237. View