Social and Psychological Issues Associated with the New Genetics
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract
This paper discusses two prevailing views--optimistic and pessimistic--about the potential benefits and risks arising from developments in human genetics and argues that we do not yet have enough evidence to assess which elements (if any) of either view are likely to be correct.
Citing Articles
Boddington P, Hogben S Health Care Anal. 2006; 14(1):1-13.
PMID: 17137015 DOI: 10.1007/s10728-006-0007-7.
References
1.
Harper P
. Genetic testing, common diseases, and health service provision. Lancet. 1995; 346(8991-8992):1645-6.
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92835-9.
View
2.
Clarke A
. Population screening for genetic susceptibility to disease. BMJ. 1995; 311(6996):35-8.
PMC: 2550088.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.35.
View
3.
Wilfond B, Fost N
. The cystic fibrosis gene: medical and social implications for heterozygote detection. JAMA. 1990; 263(10):2777-83.
View
4.
Davison C, Macintyre S, Davey Smith G
. The potential social impact of predictive genetic testing for susceptibility to common chronic diseases: a review and proposed research agenda. Sociol Health Illn. 1994; 16(3):340-71.
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11348762.
View
5.
Zimmet P, Arblaster M, Thoma K
. The effect of westernization on native populations. Studies on a Micronesian community with a high diabetes prevalence. Aust N Z J Med. 1978; 8(2):141-6.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1978.tb04500.x.
View