» Articles » PMID: 9290404

Impairment of the Myocardial Vasomotor Response to Cold Pressor Stress in Collateral Dependent Myocardium

Overview
Journal Heart
Date 1997 Jul 1
PMID 9290404
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To study the vasomotor response (cold pressor/basal flow) in myocardium perfused entirely by collaterals, using the reflex sympathetic stimulation of cold pressor stress.

Design: Regional myocardial blood flow was measured in collateral dependent and in remote myocardium using positron emission tomography with 15O water at basal and at cold pressor stress. Regional ischaemia was measured with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG).

Patients: Nine patients (mean (SD) age 53 (6) years) with an occluded coronary artery supplied entirely by collaterals from other angiographically normal arteries.

Results: In remote myocardium, basal and cold pressor flow were 0.99 (0.26) and 1.46 (0.60) ml/min/g (P < 0.05), respectively, a myocardial vasomotor response of 1.46 (0.45). In collateral dependent myocardium, basal and cold pressor flow were 0.91 (0.20) and 0.87 (0.35) ml/min/g, respectively (the latter value, P < 0.05 v remote region), a myocardial vasomotor response of 0.97 (0.43) (P < 0.05 v remote region). The myocardial vascular resistance (mean arterial pressure/flow) during cold pressor was higher in the collateral dependent than in remote myocardium, at 147.0 (61.1) and 85.6 (32.3) mm Hg.min.g/ml (P < 0.05), respectively, but with no relative increase in FDG uptake.

Conclusions: In contrast to the decrease in myocardial resistance in remote myocardium with cold pressor, an increase was observed in collateral dependent myocardium suggesting a vasoconstrictor response in resistive vessels, without demonstrable myocardial ischaemia.

Citing Articles

Pathophysiology of coronary collaterals.

Stoller M, Seiler C Curr Cardiol Rev. 2013; 10(1):38-56.

PMID: 23701025 PMC: 3968593. DOI: 10.2174/1573403x113099990005.


Coronary vasomotor function assessed by positron emission tomography.

Tamaki N, Yoshinaga K, Naya M Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009; 37(6):1213-24.

PMID: 19937243 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1311-x.

References
1.
Becker L, Pitt B . Collateral blood flow in conscious dogs with chronic coronary artery occlusion. Am J Physiol. 1971; 221(5):1507-10. DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1971.221.5.1507. View

2.
Jones C, DeFily D, Patterson J, Chilian W . Endothelium-dependent relaxation competes with alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenergic constriction in the canine epicardial coronary microcirculation. Circulation. 1993; 87(4):1264-74. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1264. View

3.
Cole J, Holland P, Glaeser D . A semiautomated technique for the rapid evaluation of left ventricular regional wall motion. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1976; 2(2):185-97. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1810020212. View

4.
Mudge Jr G, Grossman W, Mills Jr R, Lesch M, Braunwald E . Reflex increase in coronary vascular resistance in patients with ischemic heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1976; 295(24):1333-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197612092952401. View

5.
Cohen M, SONNENBLICK E, Kirk E . Coronary steal: its role in detrimental effect of isoproterenol after acute coronary occlusion in dogs. Am J Cardiol. 1976; 38(7):880-8. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90801-8. View