» Articles » PMID: 9240281

Physician Behavioral Response to a Medicare Price Reduction

Overview
Journal Health Serv Res
Specialty Health Services
Date 1997 Aug 1
PMID 9240281
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate at the individual practice level physician behavioral responses to the Medicare fee reductions mandated in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989. Symmetric and nonsymmetric behavioral responses are modeled and investigated.

Data Sources: Volume index calculated from data in the Part B Medicare Annual Data (BMAD) Provider Files for 1989 and 1990. The pricing data are from the Procedure Files.

Study Design: A fixed-effects model in carrier and in specialty is employed.

Data Collection: No direct data collection is required as BMAD files are used in the study. Price and volume variables are expressed as Fisher indexes of change.

Principal Findings: The results show nonsymmetrical behavioral response because practices that did not face significant fee reductions do not exhibit behavioral change. By contrast, losers partially compensate for the fee reductions. For every dollar cut in their fees, physicians recoup approximately 40 cents by increasing volume. Loser behavioral responses vary by specialty.

Conclusions: The presence of a volume response suggests that price control alone is not sufficient to cap rising healthcare costs. This indicates that additional or other tools must be considered if cost containment is to be attained.

Citing Articles

Inequality and private health insurance in Zimbabwe: history, politics and performance.

Mhazo A, Maponga C, Mossialos E Int J Equity Health. 2023; 22(1):54.

PMID: 36991454 PMC: 10061904. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01868-9.


Deregulation and pricing of medical services: a policy experiment based in China.

Zang W, Zhou M, Zhao S BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):501.

PMID: 34034722 PMC: 8146237. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06525-x.


Geographic variation in Part B reimbursement and physician offsetting behavior: a physician matching approach.

Brunt C, Hendrickson J Int J Health Econ Manag. 2021; 21(2):115-188.

PMID: 33738659 DOI: 10.1007/s10754-021-09297-3.


Comparison of health care utilization among patients affiliated and not affiliated with healthcare professionals in China.

Si Y, Zhou Z, Su M, Hu H, Yang Z, Chen X BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):1118.

PMID: 33272275 PMC: 7713311. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05895-y.


Reimbursement and use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Shahinian V, Kaufman S, Yan P, Herrel L, Borza T, Hollenbeck B Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(25):e6929.

PMID: 28640073 PMC: 5484181. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006929.


References
1.
Gabel J, Rice T . Reducing public expenditures for physician services: the price of paying less. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1985; 9(4):595-609. DOI: 10.1215/03616878-9-4-595. View

2.
Feldman R, Sloan F . Competition among physicians, revisited. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1988; 13(2):239-61. DOI: 10.1215/03616878-13-2-239. View

3.
Mitchell J, Wedig G, Cromwell J . The Medicare physician fee freeze: what really happened?. Health Aff (Millwood). 1989; 8(1):21-33. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.8.1.21. View

4.
Christensen S . Volume responses to exogenous changes in Medicare's payment policies. Health Serv Res. 1992; 27(1):65-79. PMC: 1069864. View

5.
Kay T . Volume and intensity of Medicare physicians' services: an overview. Health Care Financ Rev. 1991; 11(4):133-46. PMC: 4193115. View