» Articles » PMID: 9210275

Comparing the Emotional Reactions and Behavioral Intentions of Violent and Nonviolent Husbands to Aggressive, Distressed, and Other Wife Behaviors

Overview
Journal Violence Vict
Publisher Springer
Date 1996 Jan 1
PMID 9210275
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study was designed to compare the self-reported emotional reactions and behavioral intentions of violent and nonviolent husbands to a variety of wife behaviors depicted with standardized stimuli. We recruited four subject groups, including 25 men beginning domestic violence treatment programs and three groups from the community-21 maritally violent and maritally distressed men, 23 nonviolent/distressed men, and 28 nonviolent/nondistressed men. Using stimuli and measures derived from Biglan, Rothlind, Hops, and Sherman (1989), along with stimuli designed for this study, subjects read written descriptions and examples of various wife statements (e.g., aggressive, distressed, and facilitative) and viewed videotaped depictions of wife behaviors varying in verbal content and nonverbal affect (i.e., aggressive/irritated, aggressive/dysphoric, distressed/irritated, and distressed/dysphoric). In response to each wife behavior, subjects rated what their emotional reactions (e.g., sympathetic, caring, supportive, sad, anxious, irritated, angry) and their behavioral responses (e.g., try to comfort, say something supportive, discuss the subject, not say anything, say something hostile, argue) would be. As predicted, in response to a wide range of wife behaviors, and relative to nonviolent men, violent men were less likely to report sympathetic/positive emotions and more likely to experience anger and irritation, but not other negative (i.e., sad or anxious) emotions. They were also more likely to report negative behavioral intentions and less likely to report positive behavioral intentions. The theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Citing Articles

Free Your Mind: Creative Thinking Contributes to Overcoming Conflict-Related Biases.

Fahoum N, Pick H, Ivancovsky T, Shamay-Tsoory S Brain Sci. 2022; 12(11).

PMID: 36421890 PMC: 9688209. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12111566.


Impulsivity and Empathy in Dating Violence among a Sample of College Females.

Dodaj A, Sesar K, Simic N Behav Sci (Basel). 2020; 10(7).

PMID: 32698406 PMC: 7408190. DOI: 10.3390/bs10070117.


Predicting Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration From Late Adolescence to Young Adulthood.

Saint-Eloi Cadely H, Pittman J, Pettit G, Lansford J, Bates J, Dodge K J Interpers Violence. 2018; 36(9-10):NP4679-NP4704.

PMID: 30136880 PMC: 6387653. DOI: 10.1177/0886260518795173.


Empathic Accuracy and Aggression in Couples: Individual and Dyadic Links.

Cohen S, Schulz M, Liu S, Halassa M, Waldinger R J Marriage Fam. 2015; 77(3):697-711.

PMID: 26339100 PMC: 4553691. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12184.


Anger, hostility, internalizing negative emotions, and intimate partner violence perpetration: A meta-analytic review.

Birkley E, Eckhardt C Clin Psychol Rev. 2015; 37:40-56.

PMID: 25752947 PMC: 4385442. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.002.