» Articles » PMID: 9203480

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pelvic Floor in the Postpartum Patient

Overview
Date 1996 Jan 1
PMID 9203480
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to assess anatomical changes in the pelvic floor after childbirth. Six women underwent serial MRI examination within 30 hours and at 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months after delivery; 8 additional women were studied only within 30 hours of delivery. T-1 and T-2-weighted images of the pelvis in the transverse and sagittal planes with a 1.5-T MR imager were obtained. In the sagittal section we assessed the urethrovesical angle, urethral length, distance from the symphysis to the proximal and distal vagina, vaginal length, width and length of the sphincters, and the presence of sphincter defects. Axial sections were assessed for sphincter defects for the distance between the symphysis and midurethra, vagina and rectum. Only one parameter (distance between symphysis and distal vagina) changed significantly over time, without a clear trend in direction. Interobserver variation was reasonable (<15%) except for anal canal length, urethral length and distance between symphysis and anus. There were no significant correlations between birthweight and MRI parameters. There was a non-significant association (P = 0.09) between the sole combined sphincter defect and rectal injury, but not with episiotomy or parity. We concluded that it is feasible to determine multiple measurements on MR images to evaluate structures of the pelvic floor.

Citing Articles

Longitudinal comparison study of pelvic floor function between women with and without stress urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery.

Yoshida M, Murayama R, Haruna M, Matsuzaki M, Yoshimura K, Murashima S J Med Ultrason (2001). 2016; 40(2):125-31.

PMID: 27277100 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-012-0396-1.


Randomized trial of cesarean vs vaginal delivery for effects on the pelvic floor in squirrel monkeys.

Lindo F, Carr E, Reyes M, Gendron J, Ruiz J, Parks V Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213(5):735.e1-8.

PMID: 26366665 PMC: 5134251. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.003.


Pubic bone injuries in primiparous women: magnetic resonance imaging in detection and differential diagnosis of structural injury.

Brandon C, Jacobson J, Low L, Park L, DeLancey J, Miller J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 39(4):444-51.

PMID: 21728205 PMC: 3625969. DOI: 10.1002/uog.9082.


Pelvic structure and function at 1 month compared to 7 months by dynamic magnetic resonance after vaginal birth.

Yousuf A, DeLancey J, Brandon C, Miller J Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201(5):514.e1-7.

PMID: 19683686 PMC: 2783527. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.048.

References
1.
Hussain S, Stoker J, Lameris J . Anal sphincter complex: endoanal MR imaging of normal anatomy. Radiology. 1995; 197(3):671-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480737. View

2.
Allen R, Hosker G, Smith A, WARRELL D . Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990; 97(9):770-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02570.x. View

3.
Schafer A, Enck P, Furst G, Kahn T, Frieling T, Lubke H . Anatomy of the anal sphincters. Comparison of anal endosonography to magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994; 37(8):777-81. DOI: 10.1007/BF02050142. View

4.
Viktrup L, Lose G, Rolff M, Barfoed K . The symptom of stress incontinence caused by pregnancy or delivery in primiparas. Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 79(6):945-9. View

5.
Kruyt R, Delemarre J, Doornbos J, Vogel H . Normal anorectum: dynamic MR imaging anatomy. Radiology. 1991; 179(1):159-63. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.179.1.2006269. View