» Articles » PMID: 9180117

Electron Beam Computed Tomographic Coronary Calcium Score Cutpoints and Severity of Associated Angiographic Lumen Stenosis

Overview
Date 1997 Jun 1
PMID 9180117
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We sought to determine a range of cutpoints for coronary calcium scores measured by electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) in predicting the likely severity of associated angiographic coronary artery stenoses.

Background: EBCT can quantify coronary calcium and allow the estimation of atherosclerotic plaque burden, but use of the calcium score to define lumen narrowing is controversial.

Methods: A total of 213 patients (mean [+/- SD] age 50 +/- 9 years) underwent coronary angiography and EBCT. Maximal percent diameter stenosis in any artery was paired with total coronary calcium score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done using definitions of "disease" for maximal stenosis from > or = 20% to 100%, and the corresponding score cutpoints were determined for 90% sensitivity, 90% specificity or "optimal" sensitivity and specificity.

Results: ROC curve areas ranged from a mean (+/- SE) of 0.91 +/- 0.02 for > or = 20% stenosis to 0.83 +/- 0.03 for 100% stenosis. Optimal calcium score cutpoints consisted of nonoverlapping values ranging from 15 for > or = 20% stenosis to 327 for 100% stenosis, whereas sensitivities and specificities ranged from 78% to 84%, depending on maximal stenosis severity. Calcium score cutpoints for 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity were also nonoverlapping and ranged from 3 and 27, respectively, for > or = 20% stenosis to 154 and 945, respectively, for 100% stenosis; corresponding specificities and sensitivities ranged from 40% to 78%.

Conclusions: These data define the ranges for EBCT coronary calcium score cutpoints that predict the likely severity of associated maximal angiographic stenosis severity to a high sensitivity, high specificity or optimal sensitivity/specificity. These cutpoints potentially can be used in conjunction with clinical variables to predict the severity of lumen narrowing in patients undergoing assessment for coronary artery disease.

Citing Articles

Bone fragility, sarcopenia and cardiac calcifications in an elderly population: a preliminary study.

Caffarelli C, Al Refaie A, Baldassini L, Carrai P, Pondrelli C, Gonnelli S Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023; 35(5):1097-1105.

PMID: 36988828 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-023-02393-z.


Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS): A Primer.

Kumar P, Bhatia M J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023; 31(1):1-17.

PMID: 36693339 PMC: 9880346. DOI: 10.4250/jcvi.2022.0029.


The Association of Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Asadi M, Razi F, Fahimfar N, Shirani S, Behzad G, Salari P J Bone Metab. 2022; 29(4):245-254.

PMID: 36529867 PMC: 9760776. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2022.29.4.245.


Coronary calcium scoring as first-line test to detect and exclude coronary artery disease in patients presenting to the general practitioner with stable chest pain: protocol of the cluster-randomised CONCRETE trial.

Koopman M, Reijnders J, Willemsen R, van Bruggen R, Doggen C, Kietselaer B BMJ Open. 2022; 12(4):e055123.

PMID: 35440450 PMC: 9020291. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055123.


Are risk factors necessary for pretest probability assessment of coronary artery disease? A patient similarity network analysis of the PROMISE trial.

Kolossvary M, Mayrhofer T, Ferencik M, Karady J, Pagidipati N, Shah S J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022; 16(5):397-403.

PMID: 35393245 PMC: 9452442. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.03.006.