» Articles » PMID: 9178019

Conditions for Protected Inversion Polymorphism Under Supergene Selection

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 1997 Jun 1
PMID 9178019
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conditions for protected inversion polymorphism under the operation of both karyotype and supergene selection in a viability model have been analytically determined. When supergene selection (the effect of recombination in homokaryotypes lowering the mean fitness of their offspring) is acting on gene arrangements and there is no karyotype selection, it is demonstrated that a polymorphic stable equilibrium is reached by the population, which is a function of only the recombination effects in homokaryotypes. Under both supergene and karyotype selection the degree of dominance (h) of karyotype selection is critical to produce a protected inversion polymorphism. In general, the opportunity for protected polymorphism increases as the degree of dominance decreases. For small s values, the conditions for protected polymorphism are r > 2sh and c > 2s(h-1), where r and c are the average loss of viability for offspring of ST/ST and IN/IN homokaryotypes, respectively. These findings suggest that supergene selection may be an important balancing mechanism contributing to the maintenance of inversion polymorphism.

Citing Articles

Chromosomal rearrangements maintain a polymorphic supergene controlling butterfly mimicry.

Joron M, Frezal L, Jones R, Chamberlain N, Lee S, Haag C Nature. 2011; 477(7363):203-6.

PMID: 21841803 PMC: 3717454. DOI: 10.1038/nature10341.


Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation.

Kirkpatrick M, Barton N Genetics. 2005; 173(1):419-34.

PMID: 16204214 PMC: 1461441. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.047985.


Models of general frequency-dependent selection and mating-interaction effects and the analysis of selection patterns in Drosophila inversion polymorphisms.

Alvarez-Castro J, Alvarez G Genetics. 2005; 170(3):1167-79.

PMID: 15911585 PMC: 1451186. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.037754.


Molecular variation at the In(2L)t proximal breakpoint site in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Andolfatto P, Kreitman M Genetics. 2000; 154(4):1681-91.

PMID: 10747062 PMC: 1461028. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/154.4.1681.

References
1.
Wasserman M . Factors influencing fitness in chromosomal strains in Drosophila subobscura. Genetics. 1972; 72(4):691-708. PMC: 1212863. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/72.4.691. View

2.
Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D . An experimental on recombination load in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1975; 25(3):267-74. DOI: 10.1017/s001667230001569x. View

3.
Anderson W, Watanabe T . Selection by fertility in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1974; 77(3):559-64. PMC: 1213147. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/77.3.559. View

4.
Wasserman M, Koepfer H . Fitness of karyotypes in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1975; 79(1):113-26. PMC: 1213254. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/79.1.113. View

5.
Gromko M, Richmond R . Modes of Selection Maintaining an Inversion Polymorphism in DROSOPHILA PAULISTORUM. Genetics. 1978; 88(2):357-66. PMC: 1213806. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/88.2.357. View