» Articles » PMID: 9141745

The Development of MUAC-for-age Reference Data Recommended by a WHO Expert Committee

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 1997 Jan 1
PMID 9141745
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Low mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC), determined on the basis of a fixed cut-off value, has commonly been used as a proxy for low weight-for-height (wasting). The use of a fixed cut-off value was based on the observation that MUAC showed small age- and sex-specific differences. However, in 1993, a WHO Expert Committee concluded that age independence is not reflected in the true pattern of mid-upper arm growth, recommended the use of MUAC-for-age, and presented age- and sex-specific MUAC reference data developed with observations obtained from a representative sample of children in the USA aged 6-59 months. In this article, we explain the methodology for the development of these data, present age- and sex-specific growth curves and tables and discuss the applications and limitations of MUAC as a nutritional indicator. To develop the reference data, estimates were first obtained for the mean and standard deviation of MUAC for each month of age using 7-month segmental regression equations; a 5th-degree and a 3rd-degree polynomial in age was then used to describe the mean and standard deviation, respectively, of MUAC-for age. These curves show important age-specific differences, and significant sex-specific differences for boys and girls < 24 months of age. Correct interpretation of MUAC with regard to nutritional status requires the use of MUAC-for-age reference data such as those presented here.

Citing Articles

Identifying Frailty and Its Risk Factors in Pediatric Patients with Fontan Physiology.

Wilde M, Schumacher K, Yu S, Lowery R, Stoscup J, Uzark K Pediatr Cardiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39367114 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-024-03661-z.


An overview of the nutritional status of childbearing age women, children and adolescents living in a rural area of Madagascar: preliminary results of the Tany Vao project.

Conti M, Itani L, Beretta A, Yaghi K, Filosa A, Monti C Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e52.

PMID: 38282033 PMC: 10882536. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024000259.


Mid-upper arm circumference only protocol in Pakistan: missed opportunities for children suffering from severe acute malnutrition? A mixed-methods observational study.

Guesdon B, Faruqi M, Siddiqui M, Usman G, Ariser K, Shah R Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e31.

PMID: 38197153 PMC: 10830331. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024000041.


Determinants of anaemia among women of reproductive age in South Africa: A Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative (HeLTI).

Silubonde T, Smuts C, Ware L, Chidumwa G, Malan L, Norris S PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0283645.

PMID: 36996088 PMC: 10062540. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283645.


Nutritional status in young children prior to the malaria transmission season in Burkina Faso and Mali, and its impact on the incidence of clinical malaria.

de Wit M, Cairns M, Compaore Y, Sagara I, Kuepfer I, Zongo I Malar J. 2021; 20(1):274.

PMID: 34158054 PMC: 8220741. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03802-2.


References
1.
Van den Broeck J, EECKELS R, VUYLSTEKE J . Influence of nutritional status on child mortality in rural Zaire. Lancet. 1993; 341(8859):1491-5. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90632-q. View

2.
Hall G, Chowdhury S, Bloem M . Use of mid-upper-arm circumference Z scores in nutritional assessment. Lancet. 1993; 341(8858):1481. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90927-9. View

3.
Briend A, Wojtyniak B, Rowland M . Arm circumference and other factors in children at high risk of death in rural Bangladesh. Lancet. 1987; 2(8561):725-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91084-1. View

4.
Vella V, Tomkins A, Borghesi A, Migliori G, Ndiku J, Adriko B . Anthropometry and childhood mortality in northwest and southwest Uganda. Am J Public Health. 1993; 83(11):1616-8. PMC: 1694902. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.83.11.1616. View

5.
Sommer A, Loewenstein M . Nutritional status and mortality: a prospective validation of the QUAC stick. Am J Clin Nutr. 1975; 28(3):287-92. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/28.3.287. View