» Articles » PMID: 9135653

Dynamic MRI of Invasive Breast Cancer: Assessment of Three Region-of-interest Analysis Methods

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 1997 May 1
PMID 9135653
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: In this study, three region-of-interest (ROI) analysis methods based on operator-defined and semiautomated sampling of pharmacokinetic breast maps of contrast uptake are described. The observer variability and impact of the methods on the estimated enhancement characteristics of invasive cancer are also presented.

Method: Fifty-four women with invasive breast cancer underwent dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI. ROIs were drawn by two observers on parametric images obtained from compartmental modeling of the dynamic data. Three methods were used: (a) An irregular ROI was drawn to include as much of the enhancing part of the tumor as possible (large ROI); (b) a 12 pixel circular ROI was placed at the most rapidly enhancing part of the large region (small ROI); and (c) a computer algorithm interrogated the large region pixel by pixel using a 9 pixel square mask and selected the region with the highest mean parameter value (semiautomated ROI).

Results: Significant observer variability and bias were found in the enhancement measurements using the large ROI method. There was no observer bias associated with the other methods, but the variability of the small ROI method was substantial. An almost perfect observer agreement was achieved using the semiautomated method. The small and semiautomated ROI methods produced significantly higher enhancement ratios than the large ROI method, especially in grade III carcinomas.

Conclusion: Variability is inherent in subjective ROI analysis, but the semiautomated method of ROI selection and sampling of parameter images of the breast is an efficient and reliable alternative that may allow better standardization of the MR technique.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Margins of Breast Cancer Tumors by Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Deep Learning: A Preliminary Assessment.

Shia W, Kuo Y, Hsu F, Lin J, Wu W, Wu H Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 38786329 PMC: 11119441. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14101032.


Automatic ROI construction for analyzing time-signal intensity curve in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast.

Fujimoto K, Ueda Y, Kudomi S, Yonezawa T, Fujimoto Y, Ueda K Radiol Phys Technol. 2015; 9(1):30-6.

PMID: 26141767 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-015-0329-y.


Quantitative discrimination between invasive ductal carcinomas and benign lesions based on semi-automatic analysis of time intensity curves from breast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.

Yin J, Yang J, Han L, Guo Q, Zhang W J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 34:24.

PMID: 25887917 PMC: 4354764. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-015-0140-y.


3-T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: pharmacokinetic parameters versus conventional kinetic curve analysis.

El Khouli R, Macura K, Kamel I, Jacobs M, Bluemke D AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197(6):1498-505.

PMID: 22109308 PMC: 3496793. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4665.


Quantifying tumor vascular heterogeneity with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a review.

Yang X, Knopp M J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011; 2011:732848.

PMID: 21541193 PMC: 3085501. DOI: 10.1155/2011/732848.