» Articles » PMID: 9114558

Orthodontic Retraction into Recent and Healed Extraction Sites. A Histologic Study

Overview
Journal J Orofac Orthop
Specialty Dentistry
Date 1997 Jan 1
PMID 9114558
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this experimental study was to assess the advantages of an early or delayed treatment start after tooth extraction on the basis of hard-tissue findings (density, maturity, osteodynamics) and of soft-tissue responses at the extraction site. Following bilateral extraction of the second incisors, reciprocal space closure was initiated in 3 foxhounds (age: 3.5 years): group 1 (6 teeth) 12 weeks after extraction, group 2 (6 teeth) immediately after extraction. After an 8-week bodily tooth movement period and a 2-month retention period, evaluation was undertaken on the basis of clinical/radiologic and histologic criteria (sequential polychromatic bone marking, light microscopy). Histologic analysis yielded the following findings in group 1 (delayed tooth movement): low bone density at the extraction site with more mature lamellar bone, pronounced horizontal atrophy of the alveolar process with periosteal bone apposition in direction of tooth movement, increased tendency towards gingival invagination. The findings in group 2 were characterized by: higher bone density with less maturity (bundle bone) at the extraction site, broader alveolar process, reduced tendency towards gingival invagination. No qualitative difference between the 2 groups was found with respect to root resorption. The histologic findings therefore indicate that orthodontic retraction into extraction sites should be initiated at an early stage.

Citing Articles

Timing of Therapeutic Extractions Can Affect En Masse Anterior Retraction: A Split Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.

Priya D, Sundareswaran S, Mishra N, Sathyanathan S, Shibin M, Jisha B Turk J Orthod. 2025; 37(4):213-220.

PMID: 39743844 PMC: 11705195. DOI: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.6.


Augmented Corticotomy on the Lingual Side in Mandibular Anterior Region Assisting Orthodontics in Protrusive Malocclusion: A Case Report.

Lu Y, Liu H, Liu J, Chen M Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(9).

PMID: 36143857 PMC: 9505358. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58091181.


A comparative assessment of the amount and rate of orthodontic space closure toward a healed vs recent lower premolar extraction site.

Alhaija E, Al Shayeb R, Al-Khateeb S, Daher H, Daher S Angle Orthod. 2022; 92(4):463-470.

PMID: 35344007 PMC: 9235382. DOI: 10.2319/102921-797.1.


Factors affecting the stability of maxillary extraction site closure.

Bressane L, Janson G, Naveda R, de Freitas M, Garib D Dental Press J Orthod. 2021; 26(2):e2119187.

PMID: 34008738 PMC: 8130388. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.2.e2119187.oar.


Does the time-point of orthodontic space closure initiation after tooth extraction affect the incidence of gingival cleft development? A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Bertl K, Neuner H, Meran A, Bertl M, Reich I, Nemec M J Periodontol. 2019; 91(5):572-581.

PMID: 31559633 PMC: 7317775. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.19-0376.


References
1.
Follin M, Ericsson I, Thilander B . Occurrence and distribution of root resorption in orthodontically moved premolars in dogs. Angle Orthod. 1986; 56(2):164-75. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1986)056<0164:OADORR>2.0.CO;2. View

2.
AMLER M . The age factor in human extraction wound healing. J Oral Surg. 1977; 35(3):193-7. View

3.
Murphey Jr W . Oxytetracycline microfluorescent comparison of orthodontic retraction into recent and healed extraction sites. Am J Orthod. 1970; 58(3):215-39. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(70)90086-2. View

4.
AMLER M . The time sequence of tissue regeneration in human extraction wounds. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969; 27(3):309-18. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(69)90357-0. View

5.
AMLER M, Johnson P, SALMAN I . Histological and histochemical investigation of human alveolar socket healing in undisturbed extraction wounds. J Am Dent Assoc. 1960; 61:32-44. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1960.0152. View