» Articles » PMID: 9102067

The Role of Ultrasound in the Assessment of Osteoporosis: a Review

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 1997 Jan 1
PMID 9102067
Citations 93
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Osteoporosis is now being recognized as a "silent epidemic" and there is an increasing need to improve its diagnosis and management. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurement [broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and velocity] is emerging as an alternative to photon absorptiometry techniques in the assessment of osteoporosis. The fundamental principles governing ultrasound measurements are discussed, and some of the commercially available clinical systems are reviewed, particularly in relation to data acquisition methods. A review of the published in vivo and in vitro data is presented. The general consensus is that ultrasound seems to provide structural information in addition to density. The diagnostic sensitivity of ultrasound measurement of the calcaneus in the prediction of hip fracture has been shown by recent large prospective studies to be similar to hip bone mineral density (BMD) measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and superior to spine BMD. Ultrasound has also been shown to correlate better with the type of hip fracture (intertrochanteric or cervical) than BMD and to provide comparable diagnostic sensitivity to spine BMD in vertebral fractures. It has also been observed that combining the results of both ultrasound and DXA BMD significantly improved hip fracture prediction. Areas where further research is required are identified.

Citing Articles

Comparison of whole body bone mineral density measurements between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and novel bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Chuang C, Lai C, Huang A, Su P, Chu L, Hsieh K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29127.

PMID: 39582046 PMC: 11586393. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80721-7.


The Biomechanics of Musculoskeletal Tissues during Activities of Daily Living: Dynamic Assessment Using Quantitative Transmission-Mode Ultrasound Techniques.

Wearing S, Hooper S, Langton C, Keiner M, Horstmann T, Crevier-Denoix N Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(13).

PMID: 38998789 PMC: 11241410. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12131254.


Theoretical and experimental study of attenuation in cancellous bone.

Xu W, Xie W, Yu D, Sun H, Gu Y, Tao X J Biomed Opt. 2024; 29(Suppl 1):S11526.

PMID: 38505736 PMC: 10949015. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.S1.S11526.


Association between physical performance and bone mass in community-dwelling postmenopausal Japanese women: The Unzen study.

Suiko M, Mizukami S, Arima K, Nakashima H, Nishimura T, Tomita Y PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0296457.

PMID: 38165878 PMC: 10760765. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296457.


Converging evidence from exome sequencing and common variants implicates target genes for osteoporosis.

Zhou S, Sosina O, Bovijn J, Laurent L, Sharma V, Akbari P Nat Genet. 2023; 55(8):1277-1287.

PMID: 37558884 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-023-01444-5.


References
1.
Alhava E . Bone density measurements. Calcif Tissue Int. 1991; 49 Suppl:S21-3. DOI: 10.1007/BF02555082. View

2.
Abendschein W, HYATT G . Ultrasonics and selected physical properties of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970; 69:294-301. View

3.
Hans D, Schott A, Arlot M, Sornay E, Delmas P, Meunier P . Influence of anthropometric parameters on ultrasound measurements of Os calcis. Osteoporos Int. 1995; 5(5):371-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF01622259. View

4.
Heaney R, Avioli L, Chesnut 3rd C, Lappe J, Recker R, Brandenburger G . Ultrasound velocity, through bone predicts incident vertebral deformity. J Bone Miner Res. 1995; 10(3):341-5. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100302. View

5.
Bouxsein M, Courtney A, Hayes W . Ultrasound and densitometry of the calcaneus correlate with the failure loads of cadaveric femurs. Calcif Tissue Int. 1995; 56(2):99-103. DOI: 10.1007/BF00296338. View