Antiproliferative Effect of Silybin on Gynaecological Malignancies: Synergism with Cisplatin and Doxorubicin
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The aim of this study was to test the antiproliferative activity of silybin, a flavonoid, on human ovarian and breast cancer cell lines. Since flavonoids are thought to act through Type II oestrogen binding sites (Type II EBS), silybin binding to Type II EBS was also examined. Silybin, used in concentrations from 0.1 to 20 microM, exerted a dose-dependent growth inhibitory effect on OVCA 433, A2780 parental and drug-resistant ovarian cancer cells, and MCF-7 doxorubicin (DOX)-resistant breast cancer cells (IC50 = 4.8-24 microM). Both L and D diastereoisomers of silybin were effective in inhibiting A2780 WT cell growth (IC50 = 14 and 20 microM, respectively). Flow cytometry revealed that silybin decreased the percentage of cells in the S and G2-M phases of the cell cycle with a concomitant increase in cells in the G0-G1 phase. Silybin was able to compete with [3H]E2 for nuclear but not cytosolic Type II EBS. Its affinity parallels its efficacy in inhibiting cell proliferation. Furthermore, silybin (0.1 and 1 microM) potentiates the effect of cisplatin (CDDP) (0.1-1 micrograms/ml) in inhibiting A2780 WT and CDDP-resistant cell growth. Similar results were obtained on MCF-7 DOX-resistant cells when silybin (0.1 microM) was associated with doxorubicin (0.1-10 micrograms/ml). As assessed by the Berembaum isobole method, the effect of silybin-CDDP and silybin-DOX combinations results in a synergistic action. Using the 'stem cell assay' described by Hamburger and Salmon [Science 1977, 197, 461-463], we found that silybin exerted a dose-dependent inhibition of clonogenic efficiency of cells derived from three ovarian tumours (IC50 = 7.4, 4 and 6.4 microM, respectively). Since CDDP and DOX are the two most commonly used drugs for gynaecological tumours, the clinical application of silybin is currently under investigation in our institute.
Chemotherapy Resistance: Role of Mitochondrial and Autophagic Components.
Bahar E, Han S, Kim J, Yoon H Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(6).
PMID: 35326612 PMC: 8945922. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061462.
Role of Silymarin in Cancer Treatment: Facts, Hypotheses, and Questions.
Koltai T, Fliegel L J Evid Based Integr Med. 2022; 27:2515690X211068826.
PMID: 35018864 PMC: 8814827. DOI: 10.1177/2515690X211068826.
Status and Challenges of Plant-Anticancer Compounds in Cancer Treatment.
Garcia-Oliveira P, Otero P, Pereira A, Chamorro F, Carpena M, Echave J Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021; 14(2).
PMID: 33673021 PMC: 7918405. DOI: 10.3390/ph14020157.
Yang Z, Pan Q, Zhang D, Chen J, Qiu Y, Chen X Cancer Manag Res. 2019; 11:7111-7122.
PMID: 31440098 PMC: 6668021. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S201341.
Yang T, Wu Z, Wang P, Mu T, Qin H, Zhu Z J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2017; 28(7):110.
PMID: 28589526 DOI: 10.1007/s10856-017-5920-9.