A Comparison of Consistency and Taste of Five Commercial Thickeners
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
This study presents the results of a blinded test of the performance of five commercial thickners. Experimental variables considered are brand of commercial thickener, type of liquid, desired thickness, and thickening time. Success of outcome is defined by a numerical rating scale comparing the consistency and taste to actual liquid samples. The findings suggest that no one commercial thickener consistently produces a desired consistency or was consistently superior regarding taste. Success in producing certain liquid consistencies and "good taste" varied according to brand, type of liquid, desired thickness, and thickening time used. It is suggested that specific recipes be developed for each brand and liquid to be thickened. Flavorings should be tested to enhance taste.
Jain H, Jagtap M Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023; 74(Suppl 3):5645-5656.
PMID: 36742933 PMC: 9895363. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-02931-z.
[Tasteless thickening agents? A competitive comparison].
Schulz S, Scholz V, Lehnert B HNO. 2022; 70(8):588-594.
PMID: 35476148 PMC: 9329396. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-022-01161-1.
Lee C, Shim Y, Reaney M, Chang H Foods. 2021; 10(5).
PMID: 34063536 PMC: 8157041. DOI: 10.3390/foods10051100.
The Swallowing Characteristics of Thickeners, Jellies and Yoghurt Observed Using an In Vitro Model.
Patel S, McAuley W, Cook M, Sun Y, Hamdy S, Liu F Dysphagia. 2019; 35(4):685-695.
PMID: 31707519 PMC: 7351813. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-019-10074-1.
Taste acceptability of thickening agents.
Yver C, Kennedy W, Mirza N World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018; 4(2):145-147.
PMID: 30101226 PMC: 6074016. DOI: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.05.001.