» Articles » PMID: 9069319

Measurement of Patient Positioning Errors in Three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy of the Prostate

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 1997 Jan 15
PMID 9069319
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose/objective: To determine the spatial distribution of setup errors for patients treated with six-field, three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Methods And Materials: Port films for 50 patients were analyzed retrospectively. The port films were digitized and compared, using image registration software, to simulator films (representing the ideal treatment position). Patient positioning uncertainty for a given setup was determined using port films from three projections, two obliques, and one lateral. A total of 1239 port films and 300 simulator films were analyzed for the study. Patient position was analyzed for out-of-plane rotations and time trends over the course of treatment.

Results: The distribution of systematic setup errors for the 50 patients, defined as the mean patient displacement for the treatment course, had a mean and standard deviation (SD) of (-0.1 +/- 1.9) mm, (0.4 +/- 1.4) mm, and (-0.3 +/- 1.3) mm in the mediolateral (ML), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, and (-0.1 +/- 0.2) for rotational errors. The distribution of random setup errors about the mean approximated a normal distribution and the standard deviations for the population of patients in the ML, SI, and AP directions, were 2.0 mm, 1.7 mm, and 1.9 mm, respectively. The distribution of out-of-plane rotations had 1 SD of 0.9 degrees and 0.6 degrees about the SI and AP axes. Ten of the 50 patients demonstrated a statistically significant time trend in their setup position resulting in shifts ranging from 2 to 7 mm.

Conclusions: The setup verification protocol appears to minimize systematic setup errors to a level that approaches the sensitivity of the image registration technique. The random day to day fluctuations, represented by the average values of the standard deviations, are minor in comparison to the currently used margins, which further emphasizes the effectiveness of this protocol in conjunction with the use of the immobilization device.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Setup Errors in Gynecological Malignancies Treated With Radiotherapy Using Onboard Imaging.

Lnu A, Kumar P, Chauhan A, Kumar P, Nigam J, Ns S Cureus. 2023; 15(4):e37435.

PMID: 37056218 PMC: 10088567. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37435.


Characterization of GafChromic EBT2 film dose measurements using a tissue-equivalent water phantom for a Theratron® Equinox Cobalt-60 teletherapy machine.

Addo D, Kaufmann E, Tagoe S, Kyere A PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0271000.

PMID: 35984784 PMC: 9390906. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271000.


Coping with interfraction time trends in tumor setup.

Gizynska M, Kukolowicz P, Heijmen B Med Phys. 2019; 47(2):331-341.

PMID: 31721232 PMC: 7027586. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13919.


Adaptive optimization by 6 DOF robotic couch in prostate volumetric IMRT treatment: rototranslational shift and dosimetric consequences.

Chiesa S, Placidi L, Azario L, Mattiucci G, Greco F, Damiani A J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015; 16(5):35-45.

PMID: 26699314 PMC: 5690171. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5525.


Potential applications of image-guided radiotherapy for radiation dose escalation in patients with early stage high-risk prostate cancer.

Nguyen N, Davis R, Bose S, Dutta S, Vinh-Hung V, Chi A Front Oncol. 2015; 5:18.

PMID: 25699239 PMC: 4313771. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00018.