» Articles » PMID: 9065644

Staging of Laryngeal Cancer: Endoscopy, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Versus Histopathology

Overview
Date 1997 Jan 1
PMID 9065644
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An accurate pretherapeutic staging of laryngeal cancer is required for optimal treatment planning and for evaluation and comparison of the results of different treatment modalities. In this study, 45 consecutive patients with neoplasms of the larynx, treated surgically, were included in a prospective pretherapeutic staging protocol that included indirect laryngoscopy, direct microlaryngoscopy, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and Gd-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The surgical specimens were cut in whole-organ slices parallel to the plane of the axial CT and MR images. The histologic findings were then compared with clinical findings, CT and MRI. These findings showed that clinical evaluation failed to identify tumor invasion of the laryngeal cartilages and extralaryngeal soft tissues, resulting in a low staging accuracy (55%). Many pT4 tumors were clinically understaged. The combination of clinical/endoscopic evaluation and either CT or MRI resulted in a significantly improved staging accuracy (80% vs 87%, respectively). MRI was significantly more sensitive but less specific than CT in detecting neoplastic cartilage invasion. MRI tended to overestimate neoplastic cartilage invasion to possibly result in overtreatment, while CT was found to underestimate neoplastic cartilage invasion and could lead to inadequate therapeutic decisions.

Citing Articles

Clinical and Pathological Staging Discrepancies in Laryngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Pecorari G, Lorenzi A, Caria M, Motatto G, Riva G Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941822 PMC: 11815896. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030455.


Discrepancy between clinical and pathological staging of laryngeal carcinoma: a dilemma to be solved.

Tawfik A, Abd El-Fattah A, Hassan A, Helal F, Ebada H Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 281(5):2507-2513.

PMID: 38345614 PMC: 11023994. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08506-2.


Comparison of Clinical and Pathological Staging in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer After Neck Dissection.

Viana Pinto J, Sousa M, Silveira H, Vales F, Pinto Moura C Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 27(4):e571-e578.

PMID: 37876699 PMC: 10593535. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758208.


Correlation between PET-CT and ct in the staging after the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Garcia-Curdi F, Lois-Ortega Y, Muniesa-Del Campo A, McGee-Laso A, Sebastian-Cortes J, Valles-Varela H Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021; 88 Suppl 4:S143-S151.

PMID: 34933818 PMC: 9756050. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.11.008.


[Progress in CT and MRI of preoperative T staging of laryngeal carcinoma].

Qu J, Zhang M, Wei W, Yang Y Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020; 34(5):470-474.

PMID: 32791625 PMC: 10133156. DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.05.022.


References
1.
Sagel S, AufderHeide J, Aronberg D, Stanley R, Archer C . High resolution computed tomography in the staging of carcinoma of the larynx. Laryngoscope. 1981; 91(2):292-300. DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198102000-00019. View

2.
Mancuso A, Calcaterra T, Hanafee W . Computed tomography of the larynx. Radiol Clin North Am. 1978; 16(2):195-208. View

3.
Silverman P . Medullary space involvement in laryngeal carcinoma. Computed tomographic demonstration. Arch Otolaryngol. 1985; 111(8):541-2. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1985.00800100089014. View

4.
Wortham D, Hoover L, Lufkin R, Fu Y . Magnetic resonance imaging of the larynx: a correlation with histologic sections. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986; 94(1):123-33. DOI: 10.1177/019459988609400119. View

5.
Munoz A, Ramos A, Ferrando J, Gomez B, Escudero L, Relea F . Laryngeal carcinoma: sclerotic appearance of the cricoid and arytenoid cartilage--CT-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993; 189(2):433-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.189.2.8210372. View