» Articles » PMID: 9055426

Identification of Bacterial Cells by Chromosomal Painting

Overview
Date 1997 Mar 1
PMID 9055426
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chromosomal painting is a technique for the microscopic localization of genetic material. It has been applied at the subcellular level to identify regions of eukaryotic chromosomes. Here we describe the development of bacterial chromosomal painting (BCP), a related technology for the identification of bacterial cells. Purified genomic DNAs from six bacterial strains were labeled by nick translation with the fluorochrome Fluor-X, Cy3, or Cy5. The average size of the labeled fragments was ca. 50 to 200 bp. The probes were hybridized to formaldehyde-fixed microbial cells attached to slides and visualized by fluorescence microscopy. In reciprocal comparisons, distantly related members of the class Proteobacteria (Escherichia coli and Oceanospirillum linum), different species of the genus Bacillus (B. subtilis and B. megaterium), and different serotypes of the subspecies Salmonella choleraesuis subsp. choleraesuis (serotype typhimurium LT2 and serotype typhi Ty2) could easily be distinguished. A combination of two probes, each labeled with a different fluorochrome, was used successfully to simultaneously identify two cell types in a mixture. Lysozyme treatment was required for the identification of Bacillus spp., and RNase digestion and pepsin digestion were found to enhance signal strength and specificity for all cell types tested. Chromosome in situ suppression, a technique that removes cross-hybridizing fragments from the probe, was necessary for the differentiation of the Salmonella serotypes but was not required to distinguish the more distantly related taxa. BCP may have applications in diverse branches of microbiology where the objective is the identification of bacterial cells.

Citing Articles

In situ visualization of newly synthesized proteins in environmental microbes using amino acid tagging and click chemistry.

Hatzenpichler R, Scheller S, Tavormina P, Babin B, Tirrell D, Orphan V Environ Microbiol. 2014; 16(8):2568-90.

PMID: 24571640 PMC: 4122687. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12436.


Visualization and enumeration of bacteria carrying a specific gene sequence by in situ rolling circle amplification.

Maruyama F, Kenzaka T, Yamaguchi N, Tani K, Nasu M Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(12):7933-40.

PMID: 16332770 PMC: 1317385. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.7933-7940.2005.


Recognition of individual genes in diverse microorganisms by cycling primed in situ amplification.

Kenzaka T, Tamaki S, Yamaguchi N, Tani K, Nasu M Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(11):7236-44.

PMID: 16269764 PMC: 1287630. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7236-7244.2005.


Ecological significance of microdiversity: identical 16S rRNA gene sequences can be found in bacteria with highly divergent genomes and ecophysiologies.

Jaspers E, Overmann J Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004; 70(8):4831-9.

PMID: 15294821 PMC: 492463. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4831-4839.2004.


Detection of bacteria carrying the stx2 gene by in situ loop-mediated isothermal amplification.

Maruyama F, Kenzaka T, Yamaguchi N, Tani K, Nasu M Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003; 69(8):5023-8.

PMID: 12902306 PMC: 169117. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.5023-5028.2003.


References
1.
Landegent J, Jansen in de Wal N, van Ommen G, Baas F, de Vijlder J, VAN DUIJN P . Chromosomal localization of a unique gene by non-autoradiographic in situ hybridization. Nature. 1985; 317(6033):175-7. DOI: 10.1038/317175a0. View

2.
Salvi R, Ahroon W, Saunders S, Arnold S . Evoked potentials: computer-automated threshold-tracking procedure using an objective detection criterion. Ear Hear. 1987; 8(3):151-6. View

3.
Stein J, Marsh T, Wu K, Shizuya H, Delong E . Characterization of uncultivated prokaryotes: isolation and analysis of a 40-kilobase-pair genome fragment from a planktonic marine archaeon. J Bacteriol. 1996; 178(3):591-9. PMC: 177699. DOI: 10.1128/jb.178.3.591-599.1996. View

4.
van de Rijke F, Vrolijk H, Sloos W, Tanke H, Raap A . Sample preparation and in situ hybridization techniques for automated molecular cytogenetic analysis of white blood cells. Cytometry. 1996; 24(2):151-7. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19960601)24:2<151::AID-CYTO7>3.0.CO;2-M. View

5.
Lichter P, Tang C, Call K, Hermanson G, Evans G, Housman D . High-resolution mapping of human chromosome 11 by in situ hybridization with cosmid clones. Science. 1990; 247(4938):64-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.2294592. View