» Articles » PMID: 9048454

Three-year Evaluation of Brånemark Implants Connected to Angulated Abutments

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 1997 Jan 1
PMID 9048454
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A 3-year multicenter study on 63 maxillary and 10 mandibular fixed prostheses in 71 patients is reported. Angulated abutments or a combination of angulated and standard abutments were used to support prostheses; all components were from the Brånemark System. Of 425 implants initially placed, 4 were lost before abutment connection. Of the remaining 421 implants, 209 angulated (test) abutments and 212 standard (control) abutments were placed to support fixed prostheses. The prosthesis success rates were 96.8% for maxillae and 100% for mandibles. A total of 5.3% of the loaded test implants and 7.5% of the loaded control implants failed. The survival rates after 3 years were 91.3% for maxillary control implants, 94.8% for maxillary test implants, 97.4% for mandibular control implants, and 94.1% for mandibular test implants. The findings in this study pointed out that angulated abutments will not necessarily promote peri-implant mucosal problems. The study indicated that angulated abutments on Brånemark System implants have exhibited good preliminary results and should be comparable to the standard abutment as a predictable modality in prosthetic rehabilitation.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Stress Generated with Different Abutment Materials and Angulations under Axial and Oblique Loading in the Anterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Kapoor S, Rodrigues S, Mahesh M, Shetty T, Pai U, Saldanha S Int J Dent. 2021; 2021:9205930.

PMID: 34899916 PMC: 8654540. DOI: 10.1155/2021/9205930.


The Relevance of the Use of Radiographic Planning in Order to Avoid Complications in Mandibular Implantology: A Retrospective Study.

Sammartino G, Prados-Frutos J, Riccitiello F, Felice P, Cerone V, Gasparro R Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:8175284.

PMID: 27294136 PMC: 4880709. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8175284.


Three dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution around implant with straight and angled abutments in different bone qualities.

Kumar G, Mahesh B, George D J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014; 13(4):466-72.

PMID: 24431777 PMC: 3792315. DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0242-6.


Fracture behavior of straight or angulated zirconia implant abutments supporting anterior single crowns.

Nothdurft F, Doppler K, Erdelt K, Knauber A, Pospiech P Clin Oral Investig. 2010; 15(2):157-63.

PMID: 20084415 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0377-y.