» Articles » PMID: 8986484

Effects of Continuous (CPAP) and Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) on Extravascular Lung Water After Extubation of the Trachea in Patients Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 1996 Dec 1
PMID 8986484
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and bi-level positive airway pressure (Bi-PAP) on extravascular lung water during weaning from mechanical ventilation in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting.

Design: Prospective, randomized clinical study.

Setting: Intensive care unit at a university hospital.

Patients: Seventy-five patients following coronary artery bypass grafting.

Interventions: After extubation of the trachea, patients were treated for 30 min with CPAP via face mask (n = 25), with nasal BiPAP (n = 25), or with oxygen administration via nasal cannula combined with routine chest physiotherapy (RCP) for 10 min (n = 25).

Measurements And Results: Extravascular lung water (EVLW), pulmonary blood volume index (PBVI) and cardiac index (CI) were obtained during mechanical ventilation (T1), T-piece breathing (T2), interventions (T3), spontaneous breathing 60 min (T4) and 90 min (T5) after extubation of the trachea using a combined dye-thermal dilution method. Changing from mechanical ventilation to T-piece breathing did not show any significant differences in EVLW between the three groups, but a significant increase in PBVI from 155 +/- 5 ml/m2 to 170 +/- 4 ml/m2 could be observed in all groups (p < 0.05). After extubation of the trachea and treatment with BiPAP. PBVI decreased significantly to 134 +/- 6 ml/m2 (p < 0.05). After treatment with CPAP or BiPAP, EVLW did not change significantly in these groups (5.5 +/- 0.3 ml/kg vs 5.0 +/- 0.4 ml/kg and 5.1 +/- 0.4 ml/kg vs 5.7 +/- 0.4 ml/kg). In the RCP-treated group, however, EVLW increased significantly from 5.8 +/- 0.3 ml/kg to 7.1 +/- 0.4 ml/kg (p < 0.05). Sixty and 90 min after extubation, EVLW stayed at a significantly higher level in the RCP-treated group (7.5 +/- 0.5 ml/kg and 7.4 +/- 0.5 ml/kg) than in the CPAP-(5.6 +/- 0.3 ml/kg and 5.9 +/- 0.4 ml/kg) or BiPAP-treated groups (5.2 +/- 0.4 ml/kg and 5.2 +/- 0.4 ml/kg). No significant differences in CI could be observed within the three groups during the time period from mechanical ventilation to 90 min after extubation of the trachea.

Conclusions: Mask CPAP and nasal BiPAP after extubation of the trachea prevent the increase in extravascular lung water during weaning from mechanical ventilation. This effect is seen for at least 1 h after the discontinuation of CPAP or BiPAP treatment. Further studies have to evaluate the clinical relevance of this phenomenon.

Citing Articles

Safety of changes in the use of noninvasive ventilation and high flow oxygen therapy on reintubation in a surgical intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study.

Abrard S, Jean L, Rineau E, Dupre P, Leger M, Lasocki S PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0249035.

PMID: 33750979 PMC: 7984629. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249035.


Methodological Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials of Respiratory Physiotherapy in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: a Systematic Review.

Lorscheitter J, Stein C, Plentz R Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 32(4):318-337.

PMID: 28977205 PMC: 5613714. DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0014.


Does early use of bilevel positive airway pressure (bipap) in cardiothoracic intensive care unit prevent reintubation?.

Sagiroglu G, Baysal A, Copuroglu E, Gul Y, Karamustafaoglu Y, Dogukan M Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014; 7(10):3439-46.

PMID: 25419380 PMC: 4238467.


Clinical practice guidelines for the use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure in the acute care setting.

Keenan S, Sinuff T, Burns K, Muscedere J, Kutsogiannis J, Mehta S CMAJ. 2011; 183(3):E195-214.

PMID: 21324867 PMC: 3042478. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.100071.


Management of an acute exacerbation of copd: are we ignoring the evidence?.

Johnson M, Stevenson R Thorax. 2002; 57 Suppl 2:II15-II23.

PMID: 12364706 PMC: 1766002.


References
1.
Mezzanotte W, Tangel D, Fox A, Ballard R, White D . Nocturnal nasal continuous positive airway pressure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Influence on waking respiratory muscle function. Chest. 1994; 106(4):1100-8. DOI: 10.1378/chest.106.4.1100. View

2.
Pinsky M . Cardiovascular effects of ventilatory support and withdrawal. Anesth Analg. 1994; 79(3):567-76. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199409000-00029. View

3.
Renston J, DiMarco A, Supinski G . Respiratory muscle rest using nasal BiPAP ventilation in patients with stable severe COPD. Chest. 1994; 105(4):1053-60. DOI: 10.1378/chest.105.4.1053. View

4.
Pennock B, Crawshaw L, Kaplan P . Noninvasive nasal mask ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Institution of a new therapeutic technology for routine use. Chest. 1994; 105(2):441-4. DOI: 10.1378/chest.105.2.441. View

5.
Kisch H, Leucht S, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Pfeiffer U . Accuracy and reproducibility of the measurement of actively circulating blood volume with an integrated fiberoptic monitoring system. Crit Care Med. 1995; 23(5):885-93. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199505000-00017. View